{"title":"NONLINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS PROCEDURE WITH LIMITED NUMBER OF ANALYSES AND SCALING","authors":"A. Miano, F. Jalayer, H. Ebrahimian, A. Prota","doi":"10.7712/120119.6972.19723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is the most frequently used non-linear dynamic analysis procedure for seismic fragility assessment. Nevertheless, its implementation involves complications such as heavy computational burden and potential bias in the results due to excessive scaling of the ground motion records. Cloud Analysis is an alternative nonlinear dynamic analysis procedure based on the structural response to as-recorded ground motions. Cloud Analysis does not suffer from the above-mentioned complications for IDA; however, it may lead to results that reveal too much sensitivity to the choice of the ground motion records. A novel hybrid nonlinear dynamic analysis procedure referred to as “Cloud to IDA” exploits the predictive capacity provided by Cloud Analysis to perform Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) in a very efficient manner and with very little amount of scaling --without any loss of accuracy with respect to IDA. The procedure adopts as a systemic damage measure the critical demand to capacity ratio (DCR). This facilitates to a great extent identification of the intensity values at the onset of the limit state (where DCR is equal to unity by definition) and thereby the implementation of the IDA procedure. Cloud to IDA procedure is applied to the transverse perimeter frame of an older seven-storey reinforced concrete building in Van Nuys, US. This frame is modeled in OpenSees with fiber sections considering flexural-shearaxial interactions and bar slip due to fixed-end rotations. The proposed Cloud to IDA leads to results that are identical to IDA, when the same set of records are used. All of this is possible with a number of analyses that is sensibly lower with respect to IDA.","PeriodicalId":414988,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7712/120119.6972.19723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is the most frequently used non-linear dynamic analysis procedure for seismic fragility assessment. Nevertheless, its implementation involves complications such as heavy computational burden and potential bias in the results due to excessive scaling of the ground motion records. Cloud Analysis is an alternative nonlinear dynamic analysis procedure based on the structural response to as-recorded ground motions. Cloud Analysis does not suffer from the above-mentioned complications for IDA; however, it may lead to results that reveal too much sensitivity to the choice of the ground motion records. A novel hybrid nonlinear dynamic analysis procedure referred to as “Cloud to IDA” exploits the predictive capacity provided by Cloud Analysis to perform Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) in a very efficient manner and with very little amount of scaling --without any loss of accuracy with respect to IDA. The procedure adopts as a systemic damage measure the critical demand to capacity ratio (DCR). This facilitates to a great extent identification of the intensity values at the onset of the limit state (where DCR is equal to unity by definition) and thereby the implementation of the IDA procedure. Cloud to IDA procedure is applied to the transverse perimeter frame of an older seven-storey reinforced concrete building in Van Nuys, US. This frame is modeled in OpenSees with fiber sections considering flexural-shearaxial interactions and bar slip due to fixed-end rotations. The proposed Cloud to IDA leads to results that are identical to IDA, when the same set of records are used. All of this is possible with a number of analyses that is sensibly lower with respect to IDA.
增量动力分析(IDA)是地震易损性评价中最常用的非线性动力分析方法。然而,它的实施涉及复杂的问题,如沉重的计算负担和由于地面运动记录的过度缩放而导致的结果的潜在偏差。云分析是一种基于结构对地面运动响应的非线性动力分析方法。云分析不受上述IDA并发症的困扰;然而,它可能导致结果显示对地面运动记录的选择过于敏感。一种新型的混合非线性动态分析程序被称为“云到IDA”,它利用了云分析提供的预测能力,以非常有效的方式执行增量动态分析(IDA),并且缩放量很小,不会损失任何关于IDA的准确性。该方法采用临界需求容量比(DCR)作为系统损害度量。这在很大程度上有助于确定极限状态开始时的强度值(DCR在定义上等于统一),从而有助于实施IDA程序。Cloud to IDA程序应用于美国Van Nuys的一座老的七层钢筋混凝土建筑的横向周长框架。该框架在OpenSees中建模,纤维截面考虑了弯曲-剪切轴相互作用和固定端旋转引起的杆滑移。当使用相同的记录集时,建议的Cloud to IDA会导致与IDA相同的结果。所有这一切都可以通过一些相对于IDA的较低的分析来实现。