Analysis of Different Requirements of Dissimilar Metal Joint Welding Procedure Qualification Between RCC-M and ASME BPVC

W. Pei, Chen Dongxu, Yang Shumin
{"title":"Analysis of Different Requirements of Dissimilar Metal Joint Welding Procedure Qualification Between RCC-M and ASME BPVC","authors":"W. Pei, Chen Dongxu, Yang Shumin","doi":"10.1115/icone29-91363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In order to enhance the comprehension of the welding procedure qualification standards, RCC-M (Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of PWR Nuclear Islands) and ASME BPVC (American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code), used by the components fabrication for nuclear power industry in the People’s Republic of China, this paper takes the qualification of dissimilar metal joint between inlet-nozzle and safe end of steam generator in Generation III nuclear power unit as an example, taking a comparative approach, compares the requirements of different welding variables one by one between two standards and then lists the differences and analyzes the differences. It shows that RCC-M has more strict requirements than ASME BPVC on the qualification of dissimilar metal joint with buttering, the type of test couple qualified by RCC-M is more similar to product than that by ASME BPVC, and qualification by RCC-M may need more test couples than that by ASME BPVC, if choosing same value of variables which have overlap between these two standards, test coupon qualified by RCC-M can used for that qualified by ASME BPVC, but not vice versa. At last, the paper gives some implementation advises and guidance of subsequent qualification works during design and fabrication.","PeriodicalId":220265,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6: Nuclear Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6: Nuclear Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/icone29-91363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to enhance the comprehension of the welding procedure qualification standards, RCC-M (Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of PWR Nuclear Islands) and ASME BPVC (American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code), used by the components fabrication for nuclear power industry in the People’s Republic of China, this paper takes the qualification of dissimilar metal joint between inlet-nozzle and safe end of steam generator in Generation III nuclear power unit as an example, taking a comparative approach, compares the requirements of different welding variables one by one between two standards and then lists the differences and analyzes the differences. It shows that RCC-M has more strict requirements than ASME BPVC on the qualification of dissimilar metal joint with buttering, the type of test couple qualified by RCC-M is more similar to product than that by ASME BPVC, and qualification by RCC-M may need more test couples than that by ASME BPVC, if choosing same value of variables which have overlap between these two standards, test coupon qualified by RCC-M can used for that qualified by ASME BPVC, but not vice versa. At last, the paper gives some implementation advises and guidance of subsequent qualification works during design and fabrication.
RCC-M与ASME BPVC异种金属接头焊接工艺评定要求差异分析
为了加强对中华人民共和国核电工业部件制造使用的焊接程序合格标准RCC-M(压水堆核岛机械部件设计与施工规范)和ASME BPVC(美国机械工程师学会锅炉和压力容器规范)的理解,本文以三代核电机组蒸汽发生器进口喷嘴与安全端异种金属接头的鉴定为例,采用比较的方法,逐一比较两种标准对不同焊接变量的要求,并列出差异,分析差异。这表明RCC-M比ASME BPVC更有严格的要求的资格与隔离层不同的金属接头,测试几个合格的类型,通过RCC-M比这更类似于产品由ASME BPVC和资格RCC-M可能需要更多的测试比通过ASME BPVC夫妇,如果选择相同的值的变量,这两个标准之间有重叠,试样合格由ASME BPVC RCC-M可以用于限定,但不是亦然。最后,对设计和制造过程中后续的鉴定工作提出了实施建议和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信