Comparison of aluminum post etch cleaning on MEMS structures using formulated organic solvent cleaners

Lee Hou Jang Steven, V. Bliznetsov, D. Wei, Tham Dexian, S. Wickramanayaka
{"title":"Comparison of aluminum post etch cleaning on MEMS structures using formulated organic solvent cleaners","authors":"Lee Hou Jang Steven, V. Bliznetsov, D. Wei, Tham Dexian, S. Wickramanayaka","doi":"10.1109/EPTC.2014.7028269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The formulated organic solvent cleaners for aluminum (Al) post etch residues removal have been available on the market for many years. They are used in large quantities in the fabrication of integrated circuits with aluminum interconnects. However, the effectiveness of these chemistries on the aluminum MEMS structures is less well known. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of four different formulated organic solvent chemistries for Al post etch residues removal for certain types of aluminum MEMS structures. The four different formulated solvent clean chemistries evaluated in this study were ST250 from Advanced Technology Materials Incorporated (ATMI), NE14 and ACT690S from Air Products (AP), and EKC265 from DuPont. Both ST250 and NE14 were implemented in a single wafer cleaner as they are typically used in a single wafer cleaning environment. ACT690S and EKC265 were implemented in a tank on a wet bench as they were formulated to work in total immersion environment. Short loop wafers of Al MEMS structures of several microns in sizes were etched in a DPS (Decoupled Plasma Source) metal etch chamber using Cl2/BCl3 plasma followed by H2O-based plasma photoresist strip in an ASP (Advanced Strip and Passivation) chamber on the Centura etch platform. These wafers were then cleaned in one of the four different solvent chemistries for comparison. We found that each organic solvent cleaner has its own advantages and disadvantages in cleaning efficiency, cost, as well as the post etch metal corrosion. For each and every organic solvent cleaner, the process conditions during cleaning must be optimized in order to achieve the best results for residues removal and corrosion prevention.","PeriodicalId":115713,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 16th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 16th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2014.7028269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The formulated organic solvent cleaners for aluminum (Al) post etch residues removal have been available on the market for many years. They are used in large quantities in the fabrication of integrated circuits with aluminum interconnects. However, the effectiveness of these chemistries on the aluminum MEMS structures is less well known. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of four different formulated organic solvent chemistries for Al post etch residues removal for certain types of aluminum MEMS structures. The four different formulated solvent clean chemistries evaluated in this study were ST250 from Advanced Technology Materials Incorporated (ATMI), NE14 and ACT690S from Air Products (AP), and EKC265 from DuPont. Both ST250 and NE14 were implemented in a single wafer cleaner as they are typically used in a single wafer cleaning environment. ACT690S and EKC265 were implemented in a tank on a wet bench as they were formulated to work in total immersion environment. Short loop wafers of Al MEMS structures of several microns in sizes were etched in a DPS (Decoupled Plasma Source) metal etch chamber using Cl2/BCl3 plasma followed by H2O-based plasma photoresist strip in an ASP (Advanced Strip and Passivation) chamber on the Centura etch platform. These wafers were then cleaned in one of the four different solvent chemistries for comparison. We found that each organic solvent cleaner has its own advantages and disadvantages in cleaning efficiency, cost, as well as the post etch metal corrosion. For each and every organic solvent cleaner, the process conditions during cleaning must be optimized in order to achieve the best results for residues removal and corrosion prevention.
采用配方有机溶剂清洗剂对MEMS结构铝蚀刻后清洗的比较
用于铝(Al)蚀刻后残留物去除的配方有机溶剂清洁剂已在市场上销售多年。它们被大量用于制造带有铝互连的集成电路。然而,这些化学物质在铝制MEMS结构上的有效性却鲜为人知。在这项研究中,我们比较了四种不同配方的有机溶剂化学物质对某些类型的铝MEMS结构的Al蚀刻后残留物去除的有效性。本研究评估的四种不同配方的溶剂清洁化学物质分别是先进技术材料公司(ATMI)的ST250,空气产品公司(AP)的NE14和ACT690S,以及杜邦公司的EKC265。ST250和NE14都是在单个晶圆清洁器中实现的,因为它们通常用于单个晶圆清洁环境。ACT690S和EKC265是在湿工作台的水箱中进行的,因为它们的配方适用于完全浸入式环境。采用Cl2/BCl3等离子体在DPS(去耦合等离子体源)金属蚀刻室中蚀刻几微米大小的Al MEMS结构的短回路晶圆,然后在Centura蚀刻平台的ASP(高级带和钝化)室中使用h2o基等离子体光刻胶条。然后用四种不同的化学溶剂中的一种清洗这些晶圆片进行比较。我们发现每种有机溶剂清洗剂在清洗效率、成本以及蚀刻后金属腐蚀等方面都有各自的优缺点。对于每一种有机溶剂清洁剂,必须优化清洗过程中的工艺条件,以达到去除残留物和防止腐蚀的最佳效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信