An alternative focus on data in the neurorights discussion – Lessons from Brazil

Stephen Rainey, Pedro Dalese
{"title":"An alternative focus on data in the neurorights discussion – Lessons from Brazil","authors":"Stephen Rainey, Pedro Dalese","doi":"10.12688/bioethopenres.17480.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developments in neurotechnology are prompting concerns about the concepts of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty, among others. Many researchers and some policymakers have begun to propose that novel human rights are required to meet the challenges emerging neurotechnology poses. These proposals have seen high-profile discussion, gaining already state-level recognition in Chile. Others advocate a different approach by concentrating on data protection. This brief recommends this kind of focus in order to (i) help researchers to regulate the pace of development and (ii) respect the potential for risks to individuals by permitting them greater control over how their neurodata is used. A data-centred approach is an agile means of providing legal and ethical protection and permitting the direction of neurotechnology development toward producing positive impacts. This brief also refers to legislative change in Brazil, contrasted with Chile, where data law is to be revised to pre-empt neurotechnological issues. The Brazilian model emerges as an alternative that ought to be replicated by other lawmakers globally.","PeriodicalId":238268,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics Open Research","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/bioethopenres.17480.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developments in neurotechnology are prompting concerns about the concepts of mental privacy, mental integrity, and cognitive liberty, among others. Many researchers and some policymakers have begun to propose that novel human rights are required to meet the challenges emerging neurotechnology poses. These proposals have seen high-profile discussion, gaining already state-level recognition in Chile. Others advocate a different approach by concentrating on data protection. This brief recommends this kind of focus in order to (i) help researchers to regulate the pace of development and (ii) respect the potential for risks to individuals by permitting them greater control over how their neurodata is used. A data-centred approach is an agile means of providing legal and ethical protection and permitting the direction of neurotechnology development toward producing positive impacts. This brief also refers to legislative change in Brazil, contrasted with Chile, where data law is to be revised to pre-empt neurotechnological issues. The Brazilian model emerges as an alternative that ought to be replicated by other lawmakers globally.
另一种关注神经权利讨论中的数据的方法——巴西的经验教训
神经技术的发展引发了人们对精神隐私、精神完整性和认知自由等概念的担忧。许多研究人员和一些政策制定者已经开始提出,需要新的人权来应对新兴神经技术带来的挑战。这些提议已经引起了高度的讨论,在智利已经获得了国家级的认可。其他人则主张采取不同的方法,将重点放在数据保护上。本简介推荐这样的重点,以便(i)帮助研究人员调节发展的步伐,(ii)通过允许他们更好地控制如何使用他们的神经数据来尊重个人的潜在风险。以数据为中心的方法是提供法律和道德保护并使神经技术发展方向朝着产生积极影响的灵活手段。这份简报还提到了巴西的立法变化,与智利形成对比,智利的数据法将被修订,以先发制人地解决神经技术问题。巴西模式成为了一种可供全球其他立法机构效仿的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信