Towards a European Principle of Independence: The Ongoing Constitutionalisation of an Independent Energy Regulator

S. Lavrijssen
{"title":"Towards a European Principle of Independence: The Ongoing Constitutionalisation of an Independent Energy Regulator","authors":"S. Lavrijssen","doi":"10.21552/cclr/2022/1/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses recent case law of the European Court of Justice in which the European requirements concerning the political independence of national regulatory authorities in the energy sector were interpreted in a broad way. These judgements were delivered in a time in which a strong independent authority plays a crucial role in the acceleration of the energy transition by safeguarding fair market access to new entrants offering innovative energy services. At the same time, the European developments towards a politically independent regulatoryauthoritywithdiscretionary,regulatory,powersisatoddswiththewaythedemoc-racy principle and the legality principle have traditionally been interpreted in several Member States, such as in the Netherlands and Germany. However, it is argued that the latter principles do offer scope for a different interpretation than the more traditional one of the principle of legislative supremacy. A condition, however, is that accountability mechanisms must be improved to provide citizens a legal guarantee that they can have a say and that the regulatory authority can be held accountable by the courts.","PeriodicalId":157656,"journal":{"name":"Carbon & Climate Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon & Climate Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2022/1/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article analyses recent case law of the European Court of Justice in which the European requirements concerning the political independence of national regulatory authorities in the energy sector were interpreted in a broad way. These judgements were delivered in a time in which a strong independent authority plays a crucial role in the acceleration of the energy transition by safeguarding fair market access to new entrants offering innovative energy services. At the same time, the European developments towards a politically independent regulatoryauthoritywithdiscretionary,regulatory,powersisatoddswiththewaythedemoc-racy principle and the legality principle have traditionally been interpreted in several Member States, such as in the Netherlands and Germany. However, it is argued that the latter principles do offer scope for a different interpretation than the more traditional one of the principle of legislative supremacy. A condition, however, is that accountability mechanisms must be improved to provide citizens a legal guarantee that they can have a say and that the regulatory authority can be held accountable by the courts.
迈向欧洲独立原则:独立能源监管机构的持续宪法化
本文分析了欧洲法院最近的判例法,其中欧洲关于国家监管当局在能源部门的政治独立性的要求被广泛地解释。这些判决是在一个强大的独立机构通过保障提供创新能源服务的新进入者的公平市场准入,在加速能源转型方面发挥关键作用的时代做出的。与此同时,欧洲朝着具有自由裁量权、监管权和权力的政治独立监管机构的发展,与民主原则和合法性原则传统上在几个成员国(如荷兰和德国)的解释方式相矛盾。然而,有人认为,后一种原则确实提供了与更传统的立法至上原则不同的解释范围。然而,一个条件是必须改进问责机制,为公民提供一种法律保障,使他们能够有发言权,并使监管当局能够受到法院的问责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信