Subtle Mechanisms of Postmodern Discours: Return to F. Jameson

N. Malishevskaya, G. Drach
{"title":"Subtle Mechanisms of Postmodern Discours: Return to F. Jameson","authors":"N. Malishevskaya, G. Drach","doi":"10.18522/2072-0181-2015-83-3-7-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DOI 10.18522/2072-0181-2015-7-15 The article describes the situation of postmodern as a multifaceted phenomenon, connected with appearance of new type of social life and new economic way, which is named modernization, postindustrial, informative society. Such situation envelopes the whole culture, including knowledge and education, opening up questions of problematization the learning and keeping of cultural traditions. The author believes that he aesthetics of postmodern does not present a private style. It is a cultural mechanism, which considers the appearance in our culture the new formal peculiarities. The reconstruction of F. Jameson’s permits the author to display that the difference between modern and postmodern may be considered only in context of dominative cultural logic as superlative norm. The problem of transformation the postmodern in paradigm of social development is investigated here. In this case the more productive is the theory of origin the postmodern from objective tendencies social economical development the late capitalism. As a result we can see the forming of mass culture. This idea belongs to American researcher F.Jameson. On the theory of late capitalism is threaded the concept of performance practices. Society is transforming in a sort of performance, where we can see actors and spectators, who have accepted the rules of play.","PeriodicalId":186914,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Thought of Caucasus","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Thought of Caucasus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/2072-0181-2015-83-3-7-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DOI 10.18522/2072-0181-2015-7-15 The article describes the situation of postmodern as a multifaceted phenomenon, connected with appearance of new type of social life and new economic way, which is named modernization, postindustrial, informative society. Such situation envelopes the whole culture, including knowledge and education, opening up questions of problematization the learning and keeping of cultural traditions. The author believes that he aesthetics of postmodern does not present a private style. It is a cultural mechanism, which considers the appearance in our culture the new formal peculiarities. The reconstruction of F. Jameson’s permits the author to display that the difference between modern and postmodern may be considered only in context of dominative cultural logic as superlative norm. The problem of transformation the postmodern in paradigm of social development is investigated here. In this case the more productive is the theory of origin the postmodern from objective tendencies social economical development the late capitalism. As a result we can see the forming of mass culture. This idea belongs to American researcher F.Jameson. On the theory of late capitalism is threaded the concept of performance practices. Society is transforming in a sort of performance, where we can see actors and spectators, who have accepted the rules of play.
后现代话语的微妙机制:回归詹姆逊
文章将后现代的处境描述为一种多面性的现象,与新型社会生活和新的经济方式的出现联系在一起,被称为现代化、后工业、信息社会。这种情况笼罩着整个文化,包括知识和教育,使文化传统的学习和保持问题化。作者认为,后现代主义美学并没有呈现出一种私人风格。它是一种文化机制,将我们文化中的表象视为新的形式特性。詹姆逊对现代与后现代的重构表明,现代与后现代的区别只能在作为最高规范的支配性文化逻辑的语境中加以考虑。本文探讨了社会发展范式的后现代转型问题。在这种情况下,更富有成效的是源于客观倾向的后现代社会经济发展的后期资本主义起源理论。因此我们可以看到大众文化的形成。这一观点属于美国研究者詹姆森。在后期资本主义理论中贯穿着绩效实践的概念。社会在某种表演中发生着变化,我们可以看到演员和观众,他们已经接受了游戏规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信