Regulating Equity Crowdfunding in India - A Response to SEBI's Consultation Paper

Arjya B. Majumdar
{"title":"Regulating Equity Crowdfunding in India - A Response to SEBI's Consultation Paper","authors":"Arjya B. Majumdar","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2621488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, small businesses found it increasingly difficult to raise funds. As a response, equity crowdfunding has emerged as a viable alternative for sourcing capital to support innovative, entrepreneurial ideas and ventures. Equity crowdfunding merges the complexity of public funding, with the systemic risks of venture capital funding. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has recently released a consultation paper which, inter alia, proposes a framework for ushering in crowdfunding by giving start-ups and SMEs access to capital markets and to provide an additional channel of early stage funding. This paper seeks to address some of the issues concerning the regulation of crowdfunding in India. The first issue that is raised is why must crowdfunding be subject to regulation, when pre-existing securities laws may be interpreted to include crowdfunding activities. A discussion on the nature of crowdfunding and its inherent differences from venture capital and public funding sets up the foundation for which a separate exemption may be carved out of existing securities laws. Similar to the JOBS Act and other legislations around the world, SEBI’s consultation paper also seeks to create exemptions for crowdfunding activities. This raises the second issue involving a comparison of SEBI’s proposed regulations, particularly in terms of eligibility criteria for fundraisers and contributors, mechanisms, levels of disclosure and independent accreditation, etc, with that of other jurisdictions.A review of SEBI’s consultation paper would ascertain whether the principles followed by SEBI in regulating this sector would culminate in the development of crowdfunding activity, or stifle it. At the same time, SEBI’s consultation paper does not take into account two key aspects of crowdfunding. The first is that of peer to peer lending – when the proceeds of crowdfunds are issued to an individual and not a company. The second is that of cross-border crowdfunded companies. Given that crowdfunding is typically facilitated by web-based portals and promoted through social media and other internet-enabled networks, it is likely that crowdfunding activities will transcend national boundaries.","PeriodicalId":171263,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2621488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, small businesses found it increasingly difficult to raise funds. As a response, equity crowdfunding has emerged as a viable alternative for sourcing capital to support innovative, entrepreneurial ideas and ventures. Equity crowdfunding merges the complexity of public funding, with the systemic risks of venture capital funding. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has recently released a consultation paper which, inter alia, proposes a framework for ushering in crowdfunding by giving start-ups and SMEs access to capital markets and to provide an additional channel of early stage funding. This paper seeks to address some of the issues concerning the regulation of crowdfunding in India. The first issue that is raised is why must crowdfunding be subject to regulation, when pre-existing securities laws may be interpreted to include crowdfunding activities. A discussion on the nature of crowdfunding and its inherent differences from venture capital and public funding sets up the foundation for which a separate exemption may be carved out of existing securities laws. Similar to the JOBS Act and other legislations around the world, SEBI’s consultation paper also seeks to create exemptions for crowdfunding activities. This raises the second issue involving a comparison of SEBI’s proposed regulations, particularly in terms of eligibility criteria for fundraisers and contributors, mechanisms, levels of disclosure and independent accreditation, etc, with that of other jurisdictions.A review of SEBI’s consultation paper would ascertain whether the principles followed by SEBI in regulating this sector would culminate in the development of crowdfunding activity, or stifle it. At the same time, SEBI’s consultation paper does not take into account two key aspects of crowdfunding. The first is that of peer to peer lending – when the proceeds of crowdfunds are issued to an individual and not a company. The second is that of cross-border crowdfunded companies. Given that crowdfunding is typically facilitated by web-based portals and promoted through social media and other internet-enabled networks, it is likely that crowdfunding activities will transcend national boundaries.
监管印度股权众筹——对印度证券交易委员会咨询文件的回应
在2008年金融危机之后,小企业发现筹集资金越来越困难。作为回应,股权众筹已经成为一种可行的替代选择,为支持创新、创业理念和企业提供资金。股权众筹融合了公共融资的复杂性和风险投资融资的系统性风险。印度证券交易委员会(SEBI)最近发布了一份咨询文件,其中提出了一个框架,通过为初创企业和中小企业提供进入资本市场的渠道,并提供额外的早期融资渠道,从而引入众筹。本文旨在解决印度众筹监管的一些问题。提出的第一个问题是,当现有的证券法可以解释为包括众筹活动时,为什么众筹必须受到监管。对众筹的性质及其与风险投资和公共融资的内在区别的讨论,为从现有证券法中划出一项单独的豁免奠定了基础。与JOBS法案和世界各地的其他立法类似,SEBI的咨询文件也寻求为众筹活动创造豁免。这就提出了第二个问题,涉及SEBI拟议法规的比较,特别是在筹款人和捐助者的资格标准,机制,披露水平和独立认证等方面,与其他司法管辖区的比较。对SEBI咨询文件的审查将确定SEBI在监管该行业时所遵循的原则是否会最终推动众筹活动的发展,还是会扼杀它。与此同时,SEBI的咨询文件没有考虑到众筹的两个关键方面。第一种是p2p借贷,即众筹的收益发放给个人,而不是公司。二是跨境众筹公司。鉴于众筹通常由基于网络的门户网站提供便利,并通过社交媒体和其他互联网网络进行推广,众筹活动很可能会超越国界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信