Tag Loss Probability Evaluation for a Continuous Flow of Tags in the EPC-Global Standard

J. Vales-Alonso, M. Bueno-Delgado, E. Egea-López, J. García-Haro
{"title":"Tag Loss Probability Evaluation for a Continuous Flow of Tags in the EPC-Global Standard","authors":"J. Vales-Alonso, M. Bueno-Delgado, E. Egea-López, J. García-Haro","doi":"10.5220/0001742901150126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the evaluation of a passive RFID system under a continuous flow of tag arrivals and departures, for instance, in a conveyor belt installation. In such configuration, the main operational variable is the Tag Loss Probability (TLP). Since tags stay in the coverage area of the reader for a finite amount of time, it is possible that some tags leave the area unidentified if many tags compete for being simultaneously identified. A suitable configuration of the system (flow speed, tags per block, time between blocks, etc.) must be selected to assure that TLP remains under a given operative threshold. In this paper we focus on the EPCglobal Class-1 Gen-2 standard, which specifies an anti-collision protocol based on Framed Slotted Aloha. Our work is aimed at evaluating the TLP for the different configurations of such protocol, and selecting the right scenario configuration to guarantee a TLP below a given limit. This issue has not been studied yet, despite of its relevance in real-world scenarios based on assembly lines or other dynamic environments. Simulation results show that both anti-collision protocol operation mode and flow configuration heavily impacts in the performance. Additionally, real test have been conducted which confirm simulation results.","PeriodicalId":164388,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on RFID Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on RFID Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0001742901150126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the evaluation of a passive RFID system under a continuous flow of tag arrivals and departures, for instance, in a conveyor belt installation. In such configuration, the main operational variable is the Tag Loss Probability (TLP). Since tags stay in the coverage area of the reader for a finite amount of time, it is possible that some tags leave the area unidentified if many tags compete for being simultaneously identified. A suitable configuration of the system (flow speed, tags per block, time between blocks, etc.) must be selected to assure that TLP remains under a given operative threshold. In this paper we focus on the EPCglobal Class-1 Gen-2 standard, which specifies an anti-collision protocol based on Framed Slotted Aloha. Our work is aimed at evaluating the TLP for the different configurations of such protocol, and selecting the right scenario configuration to guarantee a TLP below a given limit. This issue has not been studied yet, despite of its relevance in real-world scenarios based on assembly lines or other dynamic environments. Simulation results show that both anti-collision protocol operation mode and flow configuration heavily impacts in the performance. Additionally, real test have been conducted which confirm simulation results.
epc -全球标准中标签连续流的标签丢失概率评估
本文讨论了在标签到达和离开的连续流下的无源RFID系统的评估,例如,在传送带安装中。在这种配置中,主要操作变量是标签丢失概率(Tag Loss Probability, TLP)。由于标签在阅读器的覆盖范围内停留的时间是有限的,因此如果许多标签竞争同时被识别,则可能有些标签离开该区域而未被识别。必须选择合适的系统配置(流速、每个区块的标签、区块之间的时间等),以确保TLP保持在给定的操作阈值以下。本文重点研究了EPCglobal Class-1 Gen-2标准,该标准规定了一种基于帧开槽Aloha的防碰撞协议。我们的工作旨在评估这种协议的不同配置的TLP,并选择正确的场景配置来保证TLP低于给定的限制。尽管这个问题在基于装配线或其他动态环境的现实场景中具有相关性,但尚未对其进行研究。仿真结果表明,防碰撞协议的操作方式和流配置对性能有很大影响。并进行了实际试验,验证了仿真结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信