Precise Orbit Determination of the Kepler Navigation System - a Simulation Study

G. Michalak, K. Neumayer, R. König
{"title":"Precise Orbit Determination of the Kepler Navigation System - a Simulation Study","authors":"G. Michalak, K. Neumayer, R. König","doi":"10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with precise orbit determination (POD) of a future satellite navigation system called Kepler consisting of 24 Galileo-like Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) and 6 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites connected by two-way optical inter-satellite links (ISLs) for communication, constellation-wide clock synchronization and precise ranging. The Kepler GNSS space-borne (6 LEOs) and ground data for 18 Galileo Sensor Stations are simulated with noise typical for real data including multipath, the ISL ranges are simulated with 1 mm Gaussian noise. The data are subsequently used for orbit determination in daily batches. It is demonstrated, that the POD of the Kepler system with ISL ranges and synchronized satellite clocks defining the reference time scale could be performed with just one ground station. The POD results are compared to MEO-only Galileo-like solutions. The Kepler MEO radial orbit accuracy is better than the Galileo one by a factor of 1000 in case of perfect models. To obtain more realistic results, a number of modeling errors was introduced leading to significant degradations of the orbit accuracy. However with the Kepler system, an efficient handling of the modeling errors by empirical accelerations is possible, resulting in orbit accuracies of 5 cm in 3D and 0.24 cm in radial direction. In the Kepler POD pseudo-range hardware delays and biases in the ISL ranges are additionally considered. It turns out that the estimation of the code hardware delay differences (receiver-transmitter) does not impact POD accuracy. Estimation of the ISL range biases in the presence of significant modeling errors, in turn, was found to have a rather dramatic impact, increasing the radial orbit error by an order of magnitude from 0.24 to 2 cm. ISL range biases of up to 5 mm, when not estimated, have a much smaller impact, radial orbit accuracy stays below 1 cm. It was also found, that removing the satellite fixed clocks assumption in the Kepler system with precise ISL ranges has no impact on the radial orbit component, but significantly increases the orbit error in along- and cross-track direction.","PeriodicalId":157951,"journal":{"name":"2020 European Navigation Conference (ENC)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 European Navigation Conference (ENC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The paper deals with precise orbit determination (POD) of a future satellite navigation system called Kepler consisting of 24 Galileo-like Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) and 6 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites connected by two-way optical inter-satellite links (ISLs) for communication, constellation-wide clock synchronization and precise ranging. The Kepler GNSS space-borne (6 LEOs) and ground data for 18 Galileo Sensor Stations are simulated with noise typical for real data including multipath, the ISL ranges are simulated with 1 mm Gaussian noise. The data are subsequently used for orbit determination in daily batches. It is demonstrated, that the POD of the Kepler system with ISL ranges and synchronized satellite clocks defining the reference time scale could be performed with just one ground station. The POD results are compared to MEO-only Galileo-like solutions. The Kepler MEO radial orbit accuracy is better than the Galileo one by a factor of 1000 in case of perfect models. To obtain more realistic results, a number of modeling errors was introduced leading to significant degradations of the orbit accuracy. However with the Kepler system, an efficient handling of the modeling errors by empirical accelerations is possible, resulting in orbit accuracies of 5 cm in 3D and 0.24 cm in radial direction. In the Kepler POD pseudo-range hardware delays and biases in the ISL ranges are additionally considered. It turns out that the estimation of the code hardware delay differences (receiver-transmitter) does not impact POD accuracy. Estimation of the ISL range biases in the presence of significant modeling errors, in turn, was found to have a rather dramatic impact, increasing the radial orbit error by an order of magnitude from 0.24 to 2 cm. ISL range biases of up to 5 mm, when not estimated, have a much smaller impact, radial orbit accuracy stays below 1 cm. It was also found, that removing the satellite fixed clocks assumption in the Kepler system with precise ISL ranges has no impact on the radial orbit component, but significantly increases the orbit error in along- and cross-track direction.
开普勒导航系统的精确轨道确定-模拟研究
本文讨论了名为开普勒的未来卫星导航系统的精确定轨(POD),该系统由24颗类似伽利略的中地球轨道(MEO)和6颗低地球轨道(LEO)卫星组成,通过双向光学星间链路(isl)连接,用于通信、全星座时钟同步和精确测距。对开普勒GNSS星载(6个leo)和18个伽利略传感器站的地面数据进行了多径噪声模拟,对ISL范围进行了1 mm高斯噪声模拟。这些数据随后用于每日分批次的轨道确定。结果表明,采用ISL测距和同步卫星时钟定义参考时标的开普勒系统的POD只需一个地面站即可完成。POD结果与仅meo的类伽利略解进行了比较。在完美模型的情况下,开普勒MEO的径向轨道精度比伽利略要高1000倍。为了获得更真实的结果,引入了一些建模误差,导致轨道精度显著降低。然而,在开普勒系统中,通过经验加速度有效地处理建模误差是可能的,从而使轨道精度在3D方向上达到5厘米,在径向上达到0.24厘米。在开普勒POD伪距离中,还考虑了ISL范围内的硬件延迟和偏差。结果表明,编码硬件延迟差异(接收-发送)的估计不影响POD的精度。在存在显著建模误差的情况下,ISL距离偏差的估计反过来会产生相当大的影响,将径向轨道误差增加一个数量级,从0.24厘米增加到2厘米。ISL的距离偏差高达5毫米,如果不进行估计,影响要小得多,径向轨道精度保持在1厘米以下。在具有精确ISL范围的开普勒系统中,取消卫星固定时钟假设对径向轨道分量没有影响,但会显著增加顺、交叉轨道方向的轨道误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信