Left main bifurcation stenting: a 2023 appraisal

D. Dash, R. Mody, Naveed Ahmed, Yashas Mylarappa, M. Kejariwal, Bhavya Mody
{"title":"Left main bifurcation stenting: a 2023 appraisal","authors":"D. Dash, R. Mody, Naveed Ahmed, Yashas Mylarappa, M. Kejariwal, Bhavya Mody","doi":"10.31160/jotci202331a202302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For several decades coronary bypass grafting has been considered the gold standard treatment for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions. However, the anatomic accessibility and the large caliber of the vessel render the percutaneous coronary intervention a very attractive treatment option for left main coronary artery lesions. The use of percutaneous coronary intervention in this subset of lesions has been further expanded as a result of the introduction of newer drug-eluting stents along with rapid advancements in techniques, devices, and adjunctive pharmacotherapies. The current evidence has demonstrated that patients with low or intermediate coronary complexity treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass grafting have comparable outcomes, for up to 10 years. Treatment of left main bifurcation lesions remains technically demanding despite recent developments. The provisional approach is the default strategy in most types of left main bifurcation lesions. However, a few complex left main bifurcation lesions would warrant an elective two-stent technique. An integrated approach incorporating custom- tailored techniques, adjunctive physiological and morphologic evaluation, and pharmacologic agents is critical to tackle this unique challenge and improve clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":152272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transcatheter Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31160/jotci202331a202302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For several decades coronary bypass grafting has been considered the gold standard treatment for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions. However, the anatomic accessibility and the large caliber of the vessel render the percutaneous coronary intervention a very attractive treatment option for left main coronary artery lesions. The use of percutaneous coronary intervention in this subset of lesions has been further expanded as a result of the introduction of newer drug-eluting stents along with rapid advancements in techniques, devices, and adjunctive pharmacotherapies. The current evidence has demonstrated that patients with low or intermediate coronary complexity treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass grafting have comparable outcomes, for up to 10 years. Treatment of left main bifurcation lesions remains technically demanding despite recent developments. The provisional approach is the default strategy in most types of left main bifurcation lesions. However, a few complex left main bifurcation lesions would warrant an elective two-stent technique. An integrated approach incorporating custom- tailored techniques, adjunctive physiological and morphologic evaluation, and pharmacologic agents is critical to tackle this unique challenge and improve clinical outcomes.
左主干分叉支架术:2023年评估
几十年来,冠状动脉旁路移植术一直被认为是治疗无保护的左主干冠状动脉病变的金标准。然而,解剖上的可及性和血管的大口径使得经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是治疗左主干病变的一个非常有吸引力的选择。由于新的药物洗脱支架的引入以及技术、设备和辅助药物治疗的快速进步,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在这类病变中的应用已经进一步扩大。目前的证据表明,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗的低或中等冠状动脉复杂性患者的预后可达10年。尽管最近的进展,左主干分叉病变的治疗仍然在技术上要求很高。临时入路是大多数左主干分叉病变的默认策略。然而,一些复杂的左主干分叉病变需要选择双支架技术。结合定制技术、辅助生理和形态学评估以及药物制剂的综合方法对于解决这一独特挑战和改善临床结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信