Capital Budgeting and Climate Change: Does Corporate Internal Carbon Pricing Reduce CO2 Emissions

J. Byrd, E. Cooperman, Kent Hickman
{"title":"Capital Budgeting and Climate Change: Does Corporate Internal Carbon Pricing Reduce CO2 Emissions","authors":"J. Byrd, E. Cooperman, Kent Hickman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3575769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internal carbon pricing by corporations is a relatively new tool in carbon management. Using a sample of 1,274 firms from 45 countries and across 43 industries reporting to the Carbon Disclosure Project (the CDP) during the years, 2015 to 2018, this study uses carbon emissions intensity ratios to compare the carbon emission reductions of firms that have engaged in carbon pricing for the most recent four years with other firms that do not employ internal carbon prices. Our univariate analysis for the entire sample shows no significant difference in either revenue or employee-based carbon intensities between firms using an internal carbon price and other firms. However, when we examine industry sectors with high CO2 emissions and which are capital-intensive, there is a significant difference: Carbon pricing firms reduce emissions more quickly based on both revenue intensity and employee-intensity measures. This subsample of firms is comprised of companies in the extractive, airline, ground transportation, cement manufacturing and utilities sectors, so represent firms that regularly make large capital investments. Our results are consistent with internal carbon pricing helping capital-intensive firms make investment decisions that lower carbon emissions. Multivariate regressions confirm that the effect of internal carbon pricing is additional to reductions realized from other carbon efficiency tactics pursued by sample firms. Our results are unaffected by the existence of national carbon tax plans.","PeriodicalId":127551,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Valuation","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Valuation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Internal carbon pricing by corporations is a relatively new tool in carbon management. Using a sample of 1,274 firms from 45 countries and across 43 industries reporting to the Carbon Disclosure Project (the CDP) during the years, 2015 to 2018, this study uses carbon emissions intensity ratios to compare the carbon emission reductions of firms that have engaged in carbon pricing for the most recent four years with other firms that do not employ internal carbon prices. Our univariate analysis for the entire sample shows no significant difference in either revenue or employee-based carbon intensities between firms using an internal carbon price and other firms. However, when we examine industry sectors with high CO2 emissions and which are capital-intensive, there is a significant difference: Carbon pricing firms reduce emissions more quickly based on both revenue intensity and employee-intensity measures. This subsample of firms is comprised of companies in the extractive, airline, ground transportation, cement manufacturing and utilities sectors, so represent firms that regularly make large capital investments. Our results are consistent with internal carbon pricing helping capital-intensive firms make investment decisions that lower carbon emissions. Multivariate regressions confirm that the effect of internal carbon pricing is additional to reductions realized from other carbon efficiency tactics pursued by sample firms. Our results are unaffected by the existence of national carbon tax plans.
资本预算与气候变化:企业内部碳定价是否能减少二氧化碳排放
企业内部碳定价是碳管理中一个相对较新的工具。本研究利用2015年至2018年期间向碳披露项目(CDP)报告的45个国家和43个行业的1,274家公司的样本,使用碳排放强度比来比较最近四年中参与碳定价的公司与其他未采用内部碳定价的公司的碳减排情况。我们对整个样本的单变量分析显示,在使用内部碳价的公司和其他公司之间,在收入或基于员工的碳强度方面没有显著差异。然而,当我们考察高二氧化碳排放行业和资本密集型行业时,存在显著差异:基于收入强度和员工强度指标,碳定价公司减排速度更快。这些公司的子样本包括采掘、航空、地面运输、水泥制造和公用事业部门的公司,因此代表了经常进行大笔资本投资的公司。我们的研究结果与内部碳定价有助于资本密集型企业做出降低碳排放的投资决策的结论一致。多元回归证实,内部碳定价的影响是样本公司从其他碳效率策略中实现的减排的额外影响。我们的结果不受国家碳税计划存在的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信