Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Influenza vs. COVID-19 During the First Wave of COVID-19

C. Blazoski, M. Baram, H. Hirose
{"title":"Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Influenza vs. COVID-19 During the First Wave of COVID-19","authors":"C. Blazoski, M. Baram, H. Hirose","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a refractory\ntreatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to\ninfluenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2\n(SARS-CoV-2, also referred to as COVID-19). We conducted this study to\ncompare the outcomes of influenza patients treated with veno-venous-ECMO\n(VV-ECMO) to COVID-19 patients treated with VV-ECMO, during the first\nwave of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Patients in our institution\nwith ARDS due to COVID-19 or influenza who were placed on ECMO between\nAugust 1, 2010 and September 15, 2020 were included in this comparative,\nretrospective study. To improve homogeneity, only VV -ECMO patients were\nanalyzed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted and\nanalyzed. Results: 28 COVID-19 patients and 17 influenza patients were\nidentified and included. ECMO survival rates were 68% (19/28) in\nCOVID-19 patients and 94% (16/17) in influenza patients (p=0.04).\n30-day survival rates after ECMO decannulation were 54% (15/28) in\nCOVID-19 patients and 76% (13/17) in influenza patients (p=0.13).\nCOVID-19 patients spent a longer time on ECMO compared to flu patients\n(21 days vs. 12 days, p=0.025), and more COVID-19 patients (26/28 vs.\n2/17) were on immunomodulatory therapy prior to ECMO initiation\n(p<0.001). COVID-19 patients had higher rates of new\ninfections during ECMO (50% vs. 18%, p=0.03) and bacterial pneumonia\n(36% vs 6%, p=0.024). Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who were treated\nin our institution with VV-ECMO had statistically lower ECMO survival\nrates than influenza patients. It is possible that COVID-19\nimmunomodulation therapies may increase the risk of other superimposed\ninfections.","PeriodicalId":111156,"journal":{"name":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a refractory treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, also referred to as COVID-19). We conducted this study to compare the outcomes of influenza patients treated with veno-venous-ECMO (VV-ECMO) to COVID-19 patients treated with VV-ECMO, during the first wave of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Patients in our institution with ARDS due to COVID-19 or influenza who were placed on ECMO between August 1, 2010 and September 15, 2020 were included in this comparative, retrospective study. To improve homogeneity, only VV -ECMO patients were analyzed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: 28 COVID-19 patients and 17 influenza patients were identified and included. ECMO survival rates were 68% (19/28) in COVID-19 patients and 94% (16/17) in influenza patients (p=0.04). 30-day survival rates after ECMO decannulation were 54% (15/28) in COVID-19 patients and 76% (13/17) in influenza patients (p=0.13). COVID-19 patients spent a longer time on ECMO compared to flu patients (21 days vs. 12 days, p=0.025), and more COVID-19 patients (26/28 vs. 2/17) were on immunomodulatory therapy prior to ECMO initiation (p<0.001). COVID-19 patients had higher rates of new infections during ECMO (50% vs. 18%, p=0.03) and bacterial pneumonia (36% vs 6%, p=0.024). Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who were treated in our institution with VV-ECMO had statistically lower ECMO survival rates than influenza patients. It is possible that COVID-19 immunomodulation therapies may increase the risk of other superimposed infections.
第一波COVID-19期间体外膜氧合治疗流感与COVID-19的结果
目的:体外膜氧合(ECMO)是一种难治性治疗流感和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2,也称为COVID-19)引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的方法。我们进行了这项研究,以比较在COVID-19第一波期间接受静脉-静脉- ecmo (VV-ECMO)治疗的流感患者和接受VV-ECMO治疗的COVID-19患者的结果。材料和方法:本研究纳入2010年8月1日至2020年9月15日期间在我院接受ECMO治疗的COVID-19或流感所致ARDS患者。为了提高均一性,我们只分析了VV -ECMO患者。提取并分析其临床特点和结果。结果:共发现并纳入新冠肺炎患者28例,流感患者17例。新冠肺炎患者ECMO生存率为68%(19/28),流感患者为94% (16/17)(p=0.04)。covid -19患者ECMO脱管后30天生存率为54%(15/28),流感患者为76% (13/17)(p=0.13)。与流感患者相比,COVID-19患者在ECMO上花费的时间更长(21天vs. 12天,p=0.025),更多的COVID-19患者(26/28 vs.2/17)在ECMO开始前接受免疫调节治疗(p<0.001)。在ECMO期间,COVID-19患者的新感染率更高(50%对18%,p=0.03),细菌性肺炎(36%对6%,p=0.024)。结论:在我院接受VV-ECMO治疗的COVID-19患者ECMO生存率明显低于流感患者。covid -19免疫调节疗法可能会增加其他叠加感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信