The Marble Faun in a Secular Age

Anamaria Seglie Clawson
{"title":"The Marble Faun in a Secular Age","authors":"Anamaria Seglie Clawson","doi":"10.5325/nathhawtrevi.48.2.0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay examines Hawthorne’s The Marble Faun as an early expression of (post)secular imagining. Scholars have tended to frame Hawthorne’s engagement with religion as yet another example of the ambivalence that drives much of his writing. On the one hand, they identify the persistence of religious critique in his novels—his criticism of Puritanism in The Scarlet Letter or Transcendentalism in The Blithedale Romance, for example. On the other hand, they have noted his fascination with such traditions, offering readings that uncover the historical specificity of his Puritan sources and his temporary investment in Transcendentalism. Rich as they are, such readings tend to focus on his engagement with these specific religious traditions rather than note his novels’ oscillation between enchantment and disenchantment. This essay takes up this charge by examining The Marble Faun’s depiction of Catholicism, a depiction that critics have similarly read in terms of Hawthorne’s admiration or criticism of Catholicism. This essay suggests, instead, that both impulses represent Hawthorne’s lasting search for what secular studies philosopher Charles Taylor calls “a third way”; that is, a space between orthodoxy and unbelief. Rather than locate The Marble Faun as another instance of Hawthorne’s chronic ambiguity, then, this essay locates it as a prime example of the spiritual tensions marking our “secular age.”","PeriodicalId":261601,"journal":{"name":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/nathhawtrevi.48.2.0130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay examines Hawthorne’s The Marble Faun as an early expression of (post)secular imagining. Scholars have tended to frame Hawthorne’s engagement with religion as yet another example of the ambivalence that drives much of his writing. On the one hand, they identify the persistence of religious critique in his novels—his criticism of Puritanism in The Scarlet Letter or Transcendentalism in The Blithedale Romance, for example. On the other hand, they have noted his fascination with such traditions, offering readings that uncover the historical specificity of his Puritan sources and his temporary investment in Transcendentalism. Rich as they are, such readings tend to focus on his engagement with these specific religious traditions rather than note his novels’ oscillation between enchantment and disenchantment. This essay takes up this charge by examining The Marble Faun’s depiction of Catholicism, a depiction that critics have similarly read in terms of Hawthorne’s admiration or criticism of Catholicism. This essay suggests, instead, that both impulses represent Hawthorne’s lasting search for what secular studies philosopher Charles Taylor calls “a third way”; that is, a space between orthodoxy and unbelief. Rather than locate The Marble Faun as another instance of Hawthorne’s chronic ambiguity, then, this essay locates it as a prime example of the spiritual tensions marking our “secular age.”
世俗时代的大理石羊怪
本文考察了霍桑的《大理石农牧神》作为早期(后)世俗想象的表达。学者们倾向于将霍桑与宗教的接触作为另一个矛盾心理的例子,这种矛盾心理驱使着他的大部分作品。一方面,他们确定了他的小说中对宗教批判的坚持——例如,他在《红字》中对清教主义的批判,或者在《欢乐谷浪漫》中对超验主义的批判。另一方面,他们注意到他对这些传统的迷恋,提供的阅读材料揭示了他的清教来源的历史特殊性,以及他对超验主义的暂时投资。虽然内容丰富,但这些读物往往侧重于他与这些特定宗教传统的接触,而不是注意到他的小说在迷人与祛魅之间的摇摆。这篇文章通过研究《大理石农牧之神》对天主教的描述来承担这一责任,评论家们也同样从霍桑对天主教的钦佩或批评的角度来解读这种描述。相反,这篇文章认为,这两种冲动代表了霍桑对世俗研究哲学家查尔斯·泰勒(Charles Taylor)所说的“第三条道路”的持久探索;也就是说,在正统和不信仰之间有一个空间。与其将《大理石羊怪》定位为霍桑长期模棱两可的另一个例子,不如将其定位为标志着我们“世俗时代”的精神紧张的一个主要例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信