{"title":"Self-Dealing by Corporate Insiders: Legal Constraints and Loopholes","authors":"V. Atanasov, Bernard Black, Conrad S. Ciccotello","doi":"10.4337/9781781005217.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insiders (managers and controlling shareholders) can extract (tunnel) wealth from firms using a variety of methods. This article examines the different ways in which U.S. law limits, or fails to limit, three types of self-dealing transactions – cash flow tunneling, asset tunneling, and equity tunneling. We examine how U.S. corporate, securities, bankruptcy, and tax law, accounting rules, and stock exchange rules impact each form of self-dealing, and identify weaknesses in these rules. We argue that a variety of complex asset and equity transactions, as well as equity-based executive compensation, can escape legal constraints. We propose changes in corporate, disclosure, and shareholder approval rules to address the principal gaps that emerge from our analysis. For an extended version of this article, including case studies illustrating how these loopholes are exploited, see Atanasov, Black, and Ciccotello, Law and Tunneling (2011), 37 Journal of Corporation Law 1-49, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1444414.","PeriodicalId":168140,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Internal Governance","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Internal Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005217.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Insiders (managers and controlling shareholders) can extract (tunnel) wealth from firms using a variety of methods. This article examines the different ways in which U.S. law limits, or fails to limit, three types of self-dealing transactions – cash flow tunneling, asset tunneling, and equity tunneling. We examine how U.S. corporate, securities, bankruptcy, and tax law, accounting rules, and stock exchange rules impact each form of self-dealing, and identify weaknesses in these rules. We argue that a variety of complex asset and equity transactions, as well as equity-based executive compensation, can escape legal constraints. We propose changes in corporate, disclosure, and shareholder approval rules to address the principal gaps that emerge from our analysis. For an extended version of this article, including case studies illustrating how these loopholes are exploited, see Atanasov, Black, and Ciccotello, Law and Tunneling (2011), 37 Journal of Corporation Law 1-49, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1444414.
内部人(经理和控股股东)可以使用各种方法从公司提取(隧道)财富。本文考察了美国法律限制或未能限制三种类型的自营交易的不同方式——现金流隧道、资产隧道和权益隧道。我们研究了美国公司法、证券法、破产法、税法、会计规则和证券交易所规则如何影响每种形式的自我交易,并确定了这些规则中的弱点。我们认为,各种复杂的资产和股权交易,以及基于股权的高管薪酬,可以逃避法律约束。我们建议改变公司、信息披露和股东审批规则,以解决我们分析中出现的主要差距。有关本文的扩展版本,包括说明如何利用这些漏洞的案例研究,请参阅Atanasov, Black和Ciccotello, Law and Tunneling (2011), 37 Journal of Corporation Law 1-49,可访问http://ssrn.com/abstract=1444414。