Bound by the Economic Constitution: Notes for “Law and Political Economy” in Europe

Ioannis Kampourakis
{"title":"Bound by the Economic Constitution: Notes for “Law and Political Economy” in Europe","authors":"Ioannis Kampourakis","doi":"10.5070/LP61251589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Kampourakis, Ioannis | Abstract: The aspiration of this article is to start a conversation about the possible contribution of a Law and Political Economy research agenda in Europe. I first unpack the role of law in structuring the economy at the supranational level by examining the legacy of ordoliberalism and the Economic Constitution of the EU as the normative project of insulating the internal market from political contestation. I then attempt to map the critical approaches that challenge the depoliticization of the economy and constitute the backdrop for an emerging LPE agenda. In particular, I discuss negative universalism, which focuses on the legal form as a limit to power and as enabling particular causes to make claims in universal terms; instrumentalism, which favors politicizing the law to advance egalitarian agendas; and counter-hegemony, which looks to civil society and to social transformation beyond the state. Concluding with a call for pragmatic and contextual critical practice, I attempt to carve out a space for an LPE in Europe agenda rooted in the normative commitment to democracy and equality as a form of immanent critique, in the aspiration to use institutions for social transformation, and in an orientation towards democratic power-building.","PeriodicalId":425370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Political Economy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/LP61251589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Author(s): Kampourakis, Ioannis | Abstract: The aspiration of this article is to start a conversation about the possible contribution of a Law and Political Economy research agenda in Europe. I first unpack the role of law in structuring the economy at the supranational level by examining the legacy of ordoliberalism and the Economic Constitution of the EU as the normative project of insulating the internal market from political contestation. I then attempt to map the critical approaches that challenge the depoliticization of the economy and constitute the backdrop for an emerging LPE agenda. In particular, I discuss negative universalism, which focuses on the legal form as a limit to power and as enabling particular causes to make claims in universal terms; instrumentalism, which favors politicizing the law to advance egalitarian agendas; and counter-hegemony, which looks to civil society and to social transformation beyond the state. Concluding with a call for pragmatic and contextual critical practice, I attempt to carve out a space for an LPE in Europe agenda rooted in the normative commitment to democracy and equality as a form of immanent critique, in the aspiration to use institutions for social transformation, and in an orientation towards democratic power-building.
受经济宪法约束:欧洲“法律与政治经济学”注释
摘要:本文旨在开启一场关于欧洲法律与政治经济学研究议程可能做出贡献的对话。我首先通过研究世界自由主义的遗产和欧盟经济宪法作为将内部市场与政治竞争隔离开来的规范性项目,揭示了法律在超国家层面构建经济中的作用。然后,我试图描绘挑战经济非政治化的关键方法,并构成新兴LPE议程的背景。特别是,我讨论了消极的普遍主义,它侧重于法律形式对权力的限制,并使特定的原因能够以普遍的方式提出要求;工具主义倾向于将法律政治化,以推进平等主义议程;以及反霸权主义,它着眼于公民社会和超越国家的社会转型。最后,我呼吁进行务实和情境性的批判实践,我试图为欧洲的LPE议程开辟一个空间,该议程植根于对民主和平等的规范性承诺,作为一种内在批判的形式,在利用制度进行社会转型的愿望中,以及在民主权力建设的方向上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书