Managing Multiple Institutional Logics and the Use of Accounting: Insights from a German Higher Education Institution

A. Conrath-Hargreaves, Sonja Wüstemann
{"title":"Managing Multiple Institutional Logics and the Use of Accounting: Insights from a German Higher Education Institution","authors":"A. Conrath-Hargreaves, Sonja Wüstemann","doi":"10.1111/abac.12164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the use of accounting in managing the co-existence of different institutional logics in a German higher education institution (HEI), and its impact on the HEI. The study is of particular interest as the HEI analyzed pursued its own corporatization through a re-organization from a state into a foundation university. We show that this corporatization through the adoption of new public management related ideas leads to institutional complexity arising from the co-existence of extant state and emergent business logics. Our study suggests that HEIs may deploy particular accounting practices shaped by business logic only superficially, so as to satisfy stakeholders such as governmental authorities in order to enhance their legitimacy following a self-imposed reform, while the operation of the HEI remains rooted in state logic. Specifically, the findings suggest that in the case of actual changes to the budgetary process arising through the corporatization and an emergent logic, failure to replace abandoned accounting practices shaped by a previously dominant logic with equivalent practices adhering to either extant or emerging logic(s), may put the organization at risk. Overall, our study contributes to a better understanding of the dangers of an organizational response to institutional complexity, referred to as reactive decoupling, in the management of institutional complexity and points to its negative impact on organizations' hybridization capability.","PeriodicalId":123337,"journal":{"name":"History of Accounting eJournal","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper examines the use of accounting in managing the co-existence of different institutional logics in a German higher education institution (HEI), and its impact on the HEI. The study is of particular interest as the HEI analyzed pursued its own corporatization through a re-organization from a state into a foundation university. We show that this corporatization through the adoption of new public management related ideas leads to institutional complexity arising from the co-existence of extant state and emergent business logics. Our study suggests that HEIs may deploy particular accounting practices shaped by business logic only superficially, so as to satisfy stakeholders such as governmental authorities in order to enhance their legitimacy following a self-imposed reform, while the operation of the HEI remains rooted in state logic. Specifically, the findings suggest that in the case of actual changes to the budgetary process arising through the corporatization and an emergent logic, failure to replace abandoned accounting practices shaped by a previously dominant logic with equivalent practices adhering to either extant or emerging logic(s), may put the organization at risk. Overall, our study contributes to a better understanding of the dangers of an organizational response to institutional complexity, referred to as reactive decoupling, in the management of institutional complexity and points to its negative impact on organizations' hybridization capability.
管理多重制度逻辑与会计的使用:来自德国高等教育机构的见解
本文考察了会计在德国高等教育机构(HEI)不同制度逻辑共存管理中的应用,以及它对高等教育机构的影响。这一研究之所以引人关注,是因为该大学通过从国立大学到基础大学的重组,实现了自己的公司化。通过采用新的公共管理相关理念,这种公司化导致了现存状态和新兴商业逻辑共存所产生的制度复杂性。我们的研究表明,高等教育机构可能只在表面上采用由商业逻辑形成的特定会计实践,以满足政府当局等利益相关者,从而在自我强加的改革之后增强其合法性,而高等教育机构的运作仍然植根于国家逻辑。具体来说,研究结果表明,在公司化和新兴逻辑导致预算过程发生实际变化的情况下,如果不能用现有或新兴逻辑的等效实践取代先前占主导地位的逻辑所形成的被抛弃的会计实践,可能会使组织面临风险。总体而言,我们的研究有助于更好地理解组织对制度复杂性反应的危险性,即制度复杂性管理中的反应性脱钩,并指出其对组织杂交能力的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信