Early realistic assessment of the development of innovative medical technologies in hospitals (EARTH): a conceptual model

I. Fasterholdt, K. Kidholm, K. Yderstræde, K. M. Pedersen
{"title":"Early realistic assessment of the development of innovative medical technologies in hospitals (EARTH): a conceptual model","authors":"I. Fasterholdt, K. Kidholm, K. Yderstræde, K. M. Pedersen","doi":"10.21965/IJHBHTA.2019.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2019 Fasterholdt et al., publisher and licensee CybelePress.com. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract: Hospital innovation centres increasingly make decisions concerning early development of and investment in innovative medical technologies (IMTs). At present, decisions are often made without applying a formal early assessment process to ensure selection of the most promising candidates for further development. This paper conceptualises and presents a novel model for early realistic assessment of the development of innovative medical technologies in hospitals (EARTH). The development of EARTH was based on results from a qualitative interview study exploring early assessment models in 11 organisations and a literature review of 24 models. The findings, combined with an appraisal of the models holding the most promise for hospital decision makers, led to EARTH. Eleven early assessment principles for EARTH were identified and used to create a guideline for performing and organising early assessment. The guideline consists of an analysis track and a decision track supported by three templates and five methods. In the analysis track, an impact case, a risk analysis and a “critical questioning” procedure are key elements, while in the decision track, an “evidence threshold” for “go” to usual clinical testing is essential. A model for early assessment in hospitals is proposed. EARTH (theoretically) demonstrates how a hospital can add rigour to decision making on which IMTs to pursue for further development and usual clinical testing. EARTH exhibits several desirable features relevant for early assessment, compared to traditional assessment models actually applied in hospitals. We thus believe that early assessment carries the promise of improving hospitals’ investment decisions and resource allocation during development.","PeriodicalId":406099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hospital Based Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21965/IJHBHTA.2019.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

©2019 Fasterholdt et al., publisher and licensee CybelePress.com. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract: Hospital innovation centres increasingly make decisions concerning early development of and investment in innovative medical technologies (IMTs). At present, decisions are often made without applying a formal early assessment process to ensure selection of the most promising candidates for further development. This paper conceptualises and presents a novel model for early realistic assessment of the development of innovative medical technologies in hospitals (EARTH). The development of EARTH was based on results from a qualitative interview study exploring early assessment models in 11 organisations and a literature review of 24 models. The findings, combined with an appraisal of the models holding the most promise for hospital decision makers, led to EARTH. Eleven early assessment principles for EARTH were identified and used to create a guideline for performing and organising early assessment. The guideline consists of an analysis track and a decision track supported by three templates and five methods. In the analysis track, an impact case, a risk analysis and a “critical questioning” procedure are key elements, while in the decision track, an “evidence threshold” for “go” to usual clinical testing is essential. A model for early assessment in hospitals is proposed. EARTH (theoretically) demonstrates how a hospital can add rigour to decision making on which IMTs to pursue for further development and usual clinical testing. EARTH exhibits several desirable features relevant for early assessment, compared to traditional assessment models actually applied in hospitals. We thus believe that early assessment carries the promise of improving hospitals’ investment decisions and resource allocation during development.
医院创新医疗技术发展的早期现实评估(EARTH):一个概念模型
©2019 Fasterholdt等人,出版商和被许可方CybelePress.com。这是一篇开放获取文章,允许不受限制的非商业用途,前提是原始作品被正确引用。摘要:医院创新中心越来越多地对创新医疗技术(IMTs)的早期开发和投资做出决策。目前,在作出决定时往往没有采用正式的早期评估程序,以确保选出最有希望的候选人进行进一步发展。本文概念化并提出了一种新颖的模型,用于医院创新医疗技术发展的早期现实评估(EARTH)。EARTH的开发基于一项定性访谈研究的结果,该研究探索了11个组织的早期评估模型,并对24个模型进行了文献综述。这些发现,加上对医院决策者最有希望的模型的评估,导致了EARTH。为EARTH确定了11项早期评估原则,并用于制定执行和组织早期评估的指导方针。该指南由三个模板和五种方法支持的分析轨道和决策轨道组成。在分析轨道中,影响案例、风险分析和“批判性质疑”程序是关键要素,而在决策轨道中,“进入”常规临床试验的“证据阈值”是必不可少的。提出了一种医院早期评估模型。EARTH(理论上)展示了医院如何在决策过程中增加严谨性,IMTs在决策过程中进行进一步开发和常规临床试验。与医院实际应用的传统评估模型相比,EARTH显示出一些与早期评估相关的可取特征。因此,我们认为早期评估有希望改善医院在发展过程中的投资决策和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信