A comparative study on MPPT for photovoltaic generation systems

Po-Cheng Chen, Bei-Shan Yan, Chun-Liang Liu, S. Wang, Yi-Hua Liu
{"title":"A comparative study on MPPT for photovoltaic generation systems","authors":"Po-Cheng Chen, Bei-Shan Yan, Chun-Liang Liu, S. Wang, Yi-Hua Liu","doi":"10.1109/IFEEC.2015.7361610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perturb and observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms are commonly used in photovoltaic (PV) generation system (PGS) because it is easy to implement. However, conventional fixed step-size P&O exhibits a trade-off between tracking speed and tracking accuracy. By contrast, variable step-size MPPT can achieve satisfactory tracking accuracy and speed while maintains advantage of simple calculation. This paper aimed to study the performance of two different variable step-size P&O MPPT techniques. Initially, a MATLAB based PGS model is implemented and validated. Then, variable step-size MPPT methods are compared in terms of several performance indices under various operating conditions. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of each method are then summarized.","PeriodicalId":268430,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 2nd International Future Energy Electronics Conference (IFEEC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 2nd International Future Energy Electronics Conference (IFEEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IFEEC.2015.7361610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Perturb and observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms are commonly used in photovoltaic (PV) generation system (PGS) because it is easy to implement. However, conventional fixed step-size P&O exhibits a trade-off between tracking speed and tracking accuracy. By contrast, variable step-size MPPT can achieve satisfactory tracking accuracy and speed while maintains advantage of simple calculation. This paper aimed to study the performance of two different variable step-size P&O MPPT techniques. Initially, a MATLAB based PGS model is implemented and validated. Then, variable step-size MPPT methods are compared in terms of several performance indices under various operating conditions. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of each method are then summarized.
光伏发电系统MPPT的比较研究
摄动观测(P&O)最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法因其易于实现而被广泛应用于光伏发电系统(PGS)中。然而,传统的固定步长P&O在跟踪速度和跟踪精度之间进行了权衡。而变步长MPPT在保持计算简单的优点的同时,可以获得满意的跟踪精度和速度。本文旨在研究两种不同的变步长P&O MPPT技术的性能。首先,实现并验证了基于MATLAB的PGS模型。然后,比较了变步长MPPT方法在不同工况下的几个性能指标。最后,总结了每种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信