Rethinking Knowledge Hierarchies in Teaching Educational Leadership to International Students

Bev Rogers
{"title":"Rethinking Knowledge Hierarchies in Teaching Educational Leadership to International Students","authors":"Bev Rogers","doi":"10.1108/978-1-83909-864-220211010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I began to teach within a Masters of Education (Leadership and Management) program, I questioned my assumed unproblematic nature of the presentation of Western leadership and management theories to students from a diverse range of countries without understanding the diversity. The expectations of International students are also that overseas study is designed to facilitate the transport of Western theory, as ‘the solution’ which makes the indigenous knowledges they bring struggle to appear. Few students seem to question the transferability of Western knowledge to other cultures, yet it may actually be of limited value to the real concerns and issues associated with the leadership of organisations in their home countries. Building on the ideas of Raewyn Connell and Boaventura de Sousa Santos, this chapter examines possibilities for research-led pedagogies which support an awareness of the dominance and persistence of northern-centric patterns of global knowledge production, challenging students to question their own expectations of the dominance of Western theory. Through so doing, it makes possible the re-imagining of possibilities for transformation through the emergence of alternatives, where engaging in democratic deliberation about what is gained and lost from adopting various knowledge positions informs a better understanding of human social and organisational experiences. Rather than subscribing to a single, universal and abstract hierarchy among knowledges, which privileges Western theories, cognitive justice favours context dependent knowledges. We can prepare the ground for students thinking about the knowledges they bring, and the importance of unique contextual and cultural factors through Butler's notions of intelligibility and performativity to help students understand that actions are conditioned by what is available within the culture and by what practices are legitimating. Dialogue and interpretation can occur across cultures, at the same time as raising the awareness of reciprocal incompleteness of knowledges.","PeriodicalId":384983,"journal":{"name":"Internationalisation of Educational Administration and Leadership Curriculum","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internationalisation of Educational Administration and Leadership Curriculum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-864-220211010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When I began to teach within a Masters of Education (Leadership and Management) program, I questioned my assumed unproblematic nature of the presentation of Western leadership and management theories to students from a diverse range of countries without understanding the diversity. The expectations of International students are also that overseas study is designed to facilitate the transport of Western theory, as ‘the solution’ which makes the indigenous knowledges they bring struggle to appear. Few students seem to question the transferability of Western knowledge to other cultures, yet it may actually be of limited value to the real concerns and issues associated with the leadership of organisations in their home countries. Building on the ideas of Raewyn Connell and Boaventura de Sousa Santos, this chapter examines possibilities for research-led pedagogies which support an awareness of the dominance and persistence of northern-centric patterns of global knowledge production, challenging students to question their own expectations of the dominance of Western theory. Through so doing, it makes possible the re-imagining of possibilities for transformation through the emergence of alternatives, where engaging in democratic deliberation about what is gained and lost from adopting various knowledge positions informs a better understanding of human social and organisational experiences. Rather than subscribing to a single, universal and abstract hierarchy among knowledges, which privileges Western theories, cognitive justice favours context dependent knowledges. We can prepare the ground for students thinking about the knowledges they bring, and the importance of unique contextual and cultural factors through Butler's notions of intelligibility and performativity to help students understand that actions are conditioned by what is available within the culture and by what practices are legitimating. Dialogue and interpretation can occur across cultures, at the same time as raising the awareness of reciprocal incompleteness of knowledges.
重新思考国际学生教育领导教学中的知识层次
当我开始在教育硕士(领导与管理)课程中授课时,我质疑自己对来自不同国家的学生介绍西方领导和管理理论的想当然,因为我不了解这种多样性。国际学生的期望还在于,海外学习的目的是促进西方理论的传播,作为“解决方案”,使他们带来的本土知识难以显现。似乎很少有学生质疑西方知识对其他文化的可转移性,但它实际上可能对与本国组织领导有关的实际问题和问题具有有限的价值。本章以康奈尔(Raewyn Connell)和桑托斯(Boaventura de Sousa Santos)的观点为基础,探讨了以研究为主导的教学法的可能性,这种教学法支持对以北方为中心的全球知识生产模式的主导地位和持久性的认识,挑战学生质疑他们自己对西方理论主导地位的期望。通过这样做,它可以通过替代方案的出现来重新想象转型的可能性,在这种情况下,通过民主的审议,通过采用各种知识立场得到什么和失去什么,可以更好地理解人类的社会和组织经验。与西方理论所推崇的单一的、普遍的、抽象的知识层次不同,认知正义倾向于依赖于语境的知识。我们可以为学生们思考他们带来的知识,以及独特的语境和文化因素的重要性做好准备,通过巴特勒的可理解性和表演性的概念,帮助学生理解行为是由文化中可用的东西和合法的做法决定的。对话和解释可以跨文化进行,同时提高对知识相互不完整的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信