Comparison of implicit and explicit feedback from an online music recommendation service

HetRec '10 Pub Date : 2010-09-26 DOI:10.1145/1869446.1869453
Gawesh Jawaheer, M. Szomszor, P. Kostkova
{"title":"Comparison of implicit and explicit feedback from an online music recommendation service","authors":"Gawesh Jawaheer, M. Szomszor, P. Kostkova","doi":"10.1145/1869446.1869453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explicit and implicit feedback exhibits different characteristics of users' preferences with both pros and cons. However, a combination of these two types of feedback provides another paradigm for recommender systems (RS). Their combination in a user preference model presents a number of challenges but can also overcome the problems associated with each other. In order to build an effective RS on combination of both types of feedback, we need to have comparative data allowing an understanding of the computation of user preferences. In this paper, we provide an overview of the differentiating characteristics of explicit and implicit feedback using datasets mined from Last.fm, an online music station and recommender service. The datasets consisted of explicit positive feedback (by loving tracks) and implicit feedback which is inherently positive (the number of times a track is played). Rather than relying on just one type of feedback, we present techniques for extracting user preferences from both. In order to compare and contrast the performances of these techniques, we carried out experiments using the Taste recommender system engine and the Last.fm datasets. Our results show that implicit and explicit positive feedback complements each other, with similar performances despite their different characteristics.","PeriodicalId":258506,"journal":{"name":"HetRec '10","volume":"22 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"213","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HetRec '10","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1869446.1869453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 213

Abstract

Explicit and implicit feedback exhibits different characteristics of users' preferences with both pros and cons. However, a combination of these two types of feedback provides another paradigm for recommender systems (RS). Their combination in a user preference model presents a number of challenges but can also overcome the problems associated with each other. In order to build an effective RS on combination of both types of feedback, we need to have comparative data allowing an understanding of the computation of user preferences. In this paper, we provide an overview of the differentiating characteristics of explicit and implicit feedback using datasets mined from Last.fm, an online music station and recommender service. The datasets consisted of explicit positive feedback (by loving tracks) and implicit feedback which is inherently positive (the number of times a track is played). Rather than relying on just one type of feedback, we present techniques for extracting user preferences from both. In order to compare and contrast the performances of these techniques, we carried out experiments using the Taste recommender system engine and the Last.fm datasets. Our results show that implicit and explicit positive feedback complements each other, with similar performances despite their different characteristics.
在线音乐推荐服务的隐式和显式反馈比较
显性和隐性反馈显示出用户偏好的不同特征,既有优点也有缺点。然而,这两种反馈的结合为推荐系统(RS)提供了另一种范例。它们在用户偏好模型中的组合带来了许多挑战,但也可以克服彼此相关的问题。为了在两种反馈的组合上建立有效的RS,我们需要有比较数据来理解用户偏好的计算。在本文中,我们概述了使用从Last中挖掘的数据集来区分显式和隐式反馈的特征。Fm,一个在线音乐站和推荐服务。数据集由明确的积极反馈(通过喜欢的曲目)和隐含的积极反馈(曲目播放的次数)组成。我们提出了从两种反馈中提取用户偏好的技术,而不是仅仅依赖于一种反馈。为了比较和对比这些技术的性能,我们使用Taste推荐系统引擎和Last进行了实验。fm的数据集。我们的研究结果表明,内隐和外显正反馈是互补的,尽管它们的特点不同,但它们的表现相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信