Problems of the European union and its candidate countries’ mutual relations and flexible accession as a possible way of reviving the enlargement policy

Ivana Radic-Milosavljevic
{"title":"Problems of the European union and its candidate countries’ mutual relations and flexible accession as a possible way of reviving the enlargement policy","authors":"Ivana Radic-Milosavljevic","doi":"10.2298/MEDJP1901005R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problem of the Western Balkans countries?\n accession and association process impasse. The author finds the key causes\n of this problem in the very nature of an asymmetric relationship between the\n EU and these countries with the Stabilization and Association Process laying\n in its core. Both sides have contributed to this problem: the EU with its\n overambitious approach to the region, vaguely defined and ever-changing\n criteria, but also the countries participating in the Process with their\n uncritical approach to the possible membership, unclearly defined interests\n and aims, slow reforms, and weak democratic tradition. For the process to be\n successfully continued, the author discusses the idea of its substantial\n remodeling towards a flexible process. In light of the frequent discussions\n about the possible moving of the European integration towards more\n differentiation, the process of flexible association or accession would\n enable EU membership only in selected policy areas. The policy areas would\n be chosen in accordance with the previously clearly defined and thoroughly\n analyzed interests and capabilities of the candidate and potential candidate\n countries. The author argues that the association/accession process should\n be separated as much as possible from the political conditioning in order to\n decrease the possibility of taking arbitrary decisions on whether the\n countries have advanced in the process or not. For the Western Balkan\n countries, this kind of less demanding process would be easier to accomplish\n and would allow more autonomy in choosing areas of integration and pace of\n accommodation. For the EU member states, it would provide a way to regain\n the credibility of its once most successful foreign policy activity.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1901005R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of the Western Balkans countries? accession and association process impasse. The author finds the key causes of this problem in the very nature of an asymmetric relationship between the EU and these countries with the Stabilization and Association Process laying in its core. Both sides have contributed to this problem: the EU with its overambitious approach to the region, vaguely defined and ever-changing criteria, but also the countries participating in the Process with their uncritical approach to the possible membership, unclearly defined interests and aims, slow reforms, and weak democratic tradition. For the process to be successfully continued, the author discusses the idea of its substantial remodeling towards a flexible process. In light of the frequent discussions about the possible moving of the European integration towards more differentiation, the process of flexible association or accession would enable EU membership only in selected policy areas. The policy areas would be chosen in accordance with the previously clearly defined and thoroughly analyzed interests and capabilities of the candidate and potential candidate countries. The author argues that the association/accession process should be separated as much as possible from the political conditioning in order to decrease the possibility of taking arbitrary decisions on whether the countries have advanced in the process or not. For the Western Balkan countries, this kind of less demanding process would be easier to accomplish and would allow more autonomy in choosing areas of integration and pace of accommodation. For the EU member states, it would provide a way to regain the credibility of its once most successful foreign policy activity.
欧盟及其候选国的相互关系问题以及作为恢复扩大政策的一种可能方式的灵活加入
这篇文章讨论的是西巴尔干国家的问题。加入和联合进程陷入僵局。作者认为,造成这一问题的关键原因在于欧盟与这些国家之间的不对称关系的本质,而稳定与结盟进程是其核心。双方都造成了这个问题:欧盟对该地区的态度过于雄心勃勃,定义模糊且不断变化的标准,但参与该进程的国家对可能的成员资格采取不加批判的态度,利益和目标不明确,改革缓慢,民主传统薄弱。为了使这一过程成功地继续下去,作者讨论了其向灵活过程的实质性重塑的想法。鉴于经常讨论欧洲一体化可能朝着更加分化的方向发展,灵活联合或加入的进程将只在选定的政策领域使欧盟成为成员国。政策领域将根据候选国和潜在候选国先前明确界定和彻底分析的利益和能力来选择。作者认为,应该尽可能地将加入/加入进程与政治条件分开,以减少对国家是否在这一进程中取得进展作出武断决定的可能性。对西巴尔干国家来说,这种要求较低的进程将更容易完成,并在选择一体化领域和迁就速度方面给予更大的自主权。对于欧盟成员国来说,这将提供一种途径,使其重获曾经最为成功的外交政策活动的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信