ABCs: Differentiating Algorithmic Bias, Automation Bias, and Automation Complacency

Amanda Potasznik
{"title":"ABCs: Differentiating Algorithmic Bias, Automation Bias, and Automation Complacency","authors":"Amanda Potasznik","doi":"10.1109/ETHICS57328.2023.10155094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Algorithmic bias, automation bias, and automation complacency have been identified as culprits of a variety of human-computer interaction missteps, ethical offenses, and societal harms. However, these three terms are often mistaken and conflated. Students and professionals alike may have difficulty differentiating between the terms and fully understanding the impact of such psychological phenomena on their work and research. A review of relevant literature is conducted in order to establish an overview of historical documentation and analysis of the underlying themes; definitions and examples of each concept are then synthesized in order to provide a holistic understanding of the meaning behind this set of terminology.","PeriodicalId":203527,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS)","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS57328.2023.10155094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Algorithmic bias, automation bias, and automation complacency have been identified as culprits of a variety of human-computer interaction missteps, ethical offenses, and societal harms. However, these three terms are often mistaken and conflated. Students and professionals alike may have difficulty differentiating between the terms and fully understanding the impact of such psychological phenomena on their work and research. A review of relevant literature is conducted in order to establish an overview of historical documentation and analysis of the underlying themes; definitions and examples of each concept are then synthesized in order to provide a holistic understanding of the meaning behind this set of terminology.
abc:区分算法偏差、自动化偏差和自动化自满
算法偏见、自动化偏见和自动化自满被认为是各种人机交互失误、道德犯罪和社会危害的罪魁祸首。然而,这三个术语经常被误解和混淆。学生和专业人士一样,可能很难区分这些术语,也很难完全理解这种心理现象对他们的工作和研究的影响。对相关文献进行审查,以建立历史文献的概述和对基本主题的分析;然后综合每个概念的定义和示例,以便全面理解这组术语背后的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信