A Comparative Genre Analysis of Academic Textbook Introductions in Applied Linguistics and Medicine

Seyedeh Elham Elhambakhsh, A. Jalilifar, P. White
{"title":"A Comparative Genre Analysis of Academic Textbook Introductions in Applied Linguistics and Medicine","authors":"Seyedeh Elham Elhambakhsh, A. Jalilifar, P. White","doi":"10.18844/GJFLT.V8I3.3614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by the need to explore the adjacency of introductory sections of textbooks, the present study attempted to scrutinize prefaces, introductions, and forewords, as three realizations of academic textbook introductions, in terms of their functions and potential generic structures. The study aimed to investigate the possible variations across medicine and applied linguistics, representing hard applied and soft applied sciences respectively. In order to proceed systematically in developing a potential generic model, a heuristic analysis was employed to achieve a less biased view of the nature of these variations of introductions. To this aim, 600 text samples were selected from the two disciplines. The findings showed that, overall, although the informative moves were more frequent than the promotional moves in the schematic frameworks for the different manifestations of introductions in medicine compared with applied linguistics, the genres in the two disciplines were more similar than different. The study revealed the ways in which the writers appropriated the generic resources and successfully mixed promotional, informative, and evaluative purposes of these adjacent genres. \nKeywords: Applied Linguistics, Genre analysis, Medicine, Textbook introductions;","PeriodicalId":381886,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/GJFLT.V8I3.3614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Motivated by the need to explore the adjacency of introductory sections of textbooks, the present study attempted to scrutinize prefaces, introductions, and forewords, as three realizations of academic textbook introductions, in terms of their functions and potential generic structures. The study aimed to investigate the possible variations across medicine and applied linguistics, representing hard applied and soft applied sciences respectively. In order to proceed systematically in developing a potential generic model, a heuristic analysis was employed to achieve a less biased view of the nature of these variations of introductions. To this aim, 600 text samples were selected from the two disciplines. The findings showed that, overall, although the informative moves were more frequent than the promotional moves in the schematic frameworks for the different manifestations of introductions in medicine compared with applied linguistics, the genres in the two disciplines were more similar than different. The study revealed the ways in which the writers appropriated the generic resources and successfully mixed promotional, informative, and evaluative purposes of these adjacent genres. Keywords: Applied Linguistics, Genre analysis, Medicine, Textbook introductions;
《应用语言学与医学》学术教材介绍的体裁比较分析
为了探索教科书导言部分的邻接性,本研究试图从其功能和潜在的共性结构方面来审视作为学术教科书导言的三种实现形式的前言、引言和前言。本研究旨在探讨医学和应用语言学之间可能存在的差异,它们分别代表硬应用科学和软应用科学。为了系统地进行开发潜在的通用模型,采用启发式分析来实现对这些引入变化的性质的较少偏见的看法。为此,从两个学科中选择了600个文本样本。研究结果表明,总体而言,尽管医学与应用语言学在介绍的不同表现形式的图式框架中,信息性动作比促销性动作更频繁,但两学科的类型相似性大于差异性。该研究揭示了作者利用通用资源并成功地将这些相邻体裁的宣传、信息和评估目的混合在一起的方式。关键词:应用语言学;体裁分析;医学;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信