The effect of the construction of mixed anchor items on the test equating in mixed-format tests

Sora Lee, Kyongah Sang, Tai-sun Jeong, Jun Sik Sim
{"title":"The effect of the construction of mixed anchor items on the test equating in mixed-format tests","authors":"Sora Lee, Kyongah Sang, Tai-sun Jeong, Jun Sik Sim","doi":"10.31158/jeev.2023.36.1.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the introduction of innovative items in the computer-based NAEA, the item format became diversified, and the current method of selecting anchor items from multiple-choice (MC) items became burdensome for test developers. The purpose of this study is to examine whether a mixed-format anchor items including both MC and constructed-response (CR) items could hold the stability of equating in the NAEA, and give desirable direction to expand the range of anchor items and to make test construct flexible. A simulation study was conducted based on a common-item non-equivalent group design with the test conditions of the Korean subject in the NAEA. The treatment conditions include (1) a type of anchor item set (a single MC or a mixed), (2) a composition type of mixed anchor item (MC:CR = 1:1, 3:2, or 3:4), (3) a length of mixed anchor items within a test (25%, 22%, or 19%), and (4) the presence of multidimensionality according to the item format were assumed. The main result is that there was no significant difference in the equating error between the single MC and the mixed anchor item condition. Specifically the equating error of the single MC was smaller than that of the mixed-format cases where the ratios between MC and CR were 1:1 and 3:2. In the 3:4-ratio mixed condition, the equating error was smaller than that of the single MC condition. A length of mixed anchor items within a test showed somewhat mixed results, probably because there was not much variation between the conditions in the composition ratio, about 20% in test. When there was multidimensionality according to the item format in the test, the equating error increased significantly with mixed anchor items compared to that of unidimensional test condition. In sum, about 20% of the mixed anchor items with slightly higher CR ratio was found to be suitable in the unidimensional test and caution was called for in using mixed anchor items in multidimensional test.","PeriodicalId":207460,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2023.36.1.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the introduction of innovative items in the computer-based NAEA, the item format became diversified, and the current method of selecting anchor items from multiple-choice (MC) items became burdensome for test developers. The purpose of this study is to examine whether a mixed-format anchor items including both MC and constructed-response (CR) items could hold the stability of equating in the NAEA, and give desirable direction to expand the range of anchor items and to make test construct flexible. A simulation study was conducted based on a common-item non-equivalent group design with the test conditions of the Korean subject in the NAEA. The treatment conditions include (1) a type of anchor item set (a single MC or a mixed), (2) a composition type of mixed anchor item (MC:CR = 1:1, 3:2, or 3:4), (3) a length of mixed anchor items within a test (25%, 22%, or 19%), and (4) the presence of multidimensionality according to the item format were assumed. The main result is that there was no significant difference in the equating error between the single MC and the mixed anchor item condition. Specifically the equating error of the single MC was smaller than that of the mixed-format cases where the ratios between MC and CR were 1:1 and 3:2. In the 3:4-ratio mixed condition, the equating error was smaller than that of the single MC condition. A length of mixed anchor items within a test showed somewhat mixed results, probably because there was not much variation between the conditions in the composition ratio, about 20% in test. When there was multidimensionality according to the item format in the test, the equating error increased significantly with mixed anchor items compared to that of unidimensional test condition. In sum, about 20% of the mixed anchor items with slightly higher CR ratio was found to be suitable in the unidimensional test and caution was called for in using mixed anchor items in multidimensional test.
在混合格式测试中,混合锚项目的结构对测试等价性的影响
随着基于计算机的NAEA中创新题的引入,题的形式变得多样化,目前从多项选择题(MC)中选择锚题的方法对测试开发人员来说变得繁重。本研究旨在探讨包含MC和建构反应(CR)的混合格式锚题是否能在NAEA中保持等量的稳定性,并为扩大锚题的范围和使测试结构更灵活提供理想的方向。以NAEA中国语科目的测试条件为基础,采用共同项目非等效组设计进行了模拟研究。处理条件包括(1)锚项目集类型(单个MC或混合),(2)混合锚项目的组合类型(MC:CR = 1:1, 3:2或3:4),(3)测试中混合锚项目的长度(25%,22%或19%),以及(4)根据项目格式假设存在多维性。结果表明,单锚项目条件与混合锚项目条件的方程误差无显著差异。具体而言,单一MC的等式误差小于混合格式的情况下,MC与CR的比例分别为1:1和3:2。在3:4比例混合条件下,方程误差小于单一MC条件。在一个测试中,混合锚项目的长度显示出一些混合的结果,可能是因为在组成比例的条件之间没有太大的变化,在测试中约为20%。当测试项目格式具有多维性时,混合锚题条件下的等式误差较单维测试条件下显著增加。综上所述,单维试验中约有20%的混合锚项目适合使用,CR比略高,在多维试验中应谨慎使用混合锚项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信