Now or Never: Effects of Limited Purchase Opportunities on Patterns of Regret Over Time

L. J. Abendroth, K. Diehl
{"title":"Now or Never: Effects of Limited Purchase Opportunities on Patterns of Regret Over Time","authors":"L. J. Abendroth, K. Diehl","doi":"10.1086/508438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research has demonstrated that actions are regretted more than inactions in the short term. We show that, in limited purchase opportunities-situations where the purchase decision cannot be reversed-not purchasing (inaction) is seen as a loss and is associated with greater short-term regret than purchasing, reversing the omission bias. With respect to long-term regret, we use coping and availability mechanisms to suggest that, contrary to prior findings, inaction (nonpurchase) regrets decrease over time. We also argue that action (purchase) regrets should increase over time, but only when long-term utility is low. We support our predictions with a field study and two laboratory experiments. (c) 2006 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..","PeriodicalId":321301,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/508438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

Prior research has demonstrated that actions are regretted more than inactions in the short term. We show that, in limited purchase opportunities-situations where the purchase decision cannot be reversed-not purchasing (inaction) is seen as a loss and is associated with greater short-term regret than purchasing, reversing the omission bias. With respect to long-term regret, we use coping and availability mechanisms to suggest that, contrary to prior findings, inaction (nonpurchase) regrets decrease over time. We also argue that action (purchase) regrets should increase over time, but only when long-term utility is low. We support our predictions with a field study and two laboratory experiments. (c) 2006 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..
现在或永远:有限的购买机会对后悔模式的影响
先前的研究表明,在短期内,行动比不作为更令人后悔。我们发现,在有限的购买机会中,即购买决策不能逆转的情况下,不购买(不作为)被视为一种损失,与购买相比,与更大的短期后悔相关,从而逆转了遗漏偏见。关于长期后悔,我们使用应对和可用性机制表明,与之前的研究结果相反,不作为(不购买)后悔会随着时间的推移而减少。我们还认为,行为(购买)后悔应该随着时间的推移而增加,但只有在长期效用较低时才会增加。我们通过实地研究和两个实验室实验来支持我们的预测。(c) 2006 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc.。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信