Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation

A. Brites, Kaline de Mello, P. Tavares, J. Metzger, Ricardo Rodrigues, P. Molin, Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto, C. Joly, João Adrien Fernandes, Frederico Machado, Eduardo Trani, G. Sparovek
{"title":"Science-based Stakeholder Dialogue for Environmental Policy Implementation","authors":"A. Brites, Kaline de Mello, P. Tavares, J. Metzger, Ricardo Rodrigues, P. Molin, Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto, C. Joly, João Adrien Fernandes, Frederico Machado, Eduardo Trani, G. Sparovek","doi":"10.4103/cs.cs_20_134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science-based stakeholder dialogue is a strategy to bring science closer to decision-making with increasing importance for the design of environmental policies. The need for such an approximation has been stressed, but documented implementations are rare. We present our experience of developing a science-based dialogue for the Brazilian Forest Code implementation and share the lessons learned. We departed from a mix of participatory methods to conduct six meetings with stakeholders. During the process, we were able to reduce the gap between science and practice, meeting stakeholders' expectations and increasing the accessibility of scientific information. Avoiding falling back to top-down science and keeping stakeholders' participation constancy were challenges faced. Despite the project achievements, important scientific outcomes were disregarded by higher instances of decision-making. Thus, although we were able to start the dialogue successfully, we also come across the fact that external political factors impaired its reach. By reporting our experience, we expect to help to establish science-based dialogues applied to environmental policy implementation, narrowing the science-practice gap and contributing to more effective environmental policies.","PeriodicalId":376207,"journal":{"name":"Conservation and Society","volume":"302 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_20_134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Science-based stakeholder dialogue is a strategy to bring science closer to decision-making with increasing importance for the design of environmental policies. The need for such an approximation has been stressed, but documented implementations are rare. We present our experience of developing a science-based dialogue for the Brazilian Forest Code implementation and share the lessons learned. We departed from a mix of participatory methods to conduct six meetings with stakeholders. During the process, we were able to reduce the gap between science and practice, meeting stakeholders' expectations and increasing the accessibility of scientific information. Avoiding falling back to top-down science and keeping stakeholders' participation constancy were challenges faced. Despite the project achievements, important scientific outcomes were disregarded by higher instances of decision-making. Thus, although we were able to start the dialogue successfully, we also come across the fact that external political factors impaired its reach. By reporting our experience, we expect to help to establish science-based dialogues applied to environmental policy implementation, narrowing the science-practice gap and contributing to more effective environmental policies.
以科学为基础的环境政策实施利益相关者对话
基于科学的利益相关者对话是一种使科学更接近决策的战略,对环境政策的设计越来越重要。已经强调了对这种近似的需要,但是文档化的实现很少。我们介绍了为实施《巴西森林法》开展科学对话的经验,并分享了经验教训。我们脱离了混合参与式方法,与利益相关者举行了六次会议。在这个过程中,我们能够缩小科学与实践之间的差距,满足利益相关者的期望,增加科学信息的可及性。避免退回到自上而下的科学,保持利益相关者的持续参与是面临的挑战。尽管项目取得了成就,但重要的科学成果却被高层决策忽视了。因此,虽然我们能够成功地开始对话,但我们也遇到这样一个事实,即外部政治因素损害了对话的范围。通过报告我们的经验,我们希望帮助建立适用于环境政策实施的基于科学的对话,缩小科学与实践之间的差距,并为更有效的环境政策做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信