Networking the commons: creative commons project creators funding patterns in crowdfunding

Rong Wang, Li Lu, Janet Fulk
{"title":"Networking the commons: creative commons project creators funding patterns in crowdfunding","authors":"Rong Wang, Li Lu, Janet Fulk","doi":"10.1108/oir-05-2020-0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeGuided by the collective action theory, signaling theory and social identity approach, this study examines backing behavior by individuals who have created projects under CC licenses. Two motivational mechanisms were examined: (1) identification via common interests in the CC space; (2) resource signaling by other users via their diverse project creation experience, funding or commenting activity.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from Kickstarter.com. Exponential random graph modeling was used to examine how the two reviewed mechanisms influence the tie formation probability between Creative Commons (CC) project creators and other creators. The analysis was conducted on two subnetworks: one with ties between CC creators; and one with ties from CC creators to non-CC creators.FindingsThe study found that CC creators exhibit distinct backing patterns when considering funding other CC creators compared to non-CC users. When considering funding their peer CC creators, CC identity can help them allocate and support perceived in-group members; when considering funding non-CC creators, shared common interests in competitive project categories potentially triggers a competition mindset and makes them hold back when they see potential rivals.Originality/valueThis study makes three contributions. First, it draws from multiple theoretical frameworks to investigate unique motivations when crowdfunders take on dual roles of creators and funders and offered implications on how to manage competition and collaboration simultaneously. Second, with network analysis our study not only identifies multiple motivators at work for collective action, but also demonstrates their differential effects in crowdfunding. Third, the integration of multiple theoretical frameworks allows opportunities for theory building.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0166.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-05-2020-0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeGuided by the collective action theory, signaling theory and social identity approach, this study examines backing behavior by individuals who have created projects under CC licenses. Two motivational mechanisms were examined: (1) identification via common interests in the CC space; (2) resource signaling by other users via their diverse project creation experience, funding or commenting activity.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from Kickstarter.com. Exponential random graph modeling was used to examine how the two reviewed mechanisms influence the tie formation probability between Creative Commons (CC) project creators and other creators. The analysis was conducted on two subnetworks: one with ties between CC creators; and one with ties from CC creators to non-CC creators.FindingsThe study found that CC creators exhibit distinct backing patterns when considering funding other CC creators compared to non-CC users. When considering funding their peer CC creators, CC identity can help them allocate and support perceived in-group members; when considering funding non-CC creators, shared common interests in competitive project categories potentially triggers a competition mindset and makes them hold back when they see potential rivals.Originality/valueThis study makes three contributions. First, it draws from multiple theoretical frameworks to investigate unique motivations when crowdfunders take on dual roles of creators and funders and offered implications on how to manage competition and collaboration simultaneously. Second, with network analysis our study not only identifies multiple motivators at work for collective action, but also demonstrates their differential effects in crowdfunding. Third, the integration of multiple theoretical frameworks allows opportunities for theory building.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0166.
网络公地:创意公地项目创造者在众筹中的筹资模式
在集体行动理论、信号理论和社会认同方法的指导下,本研究考察了在CC许可下创建项目的个人的支持行为。研究了两种激励机制:(1)共同利益认同;(2)其他用户通过其不同的项目创建经验、资助或评论活动发出的资源信号。设计/方法/方法数据收集自kickstarter网站。指数随机图模型用于研究这两种机制如何影响知识共享项目创建者和其他创建者之间的联系形成概率。对两个子网进行了分析:一个是CC创建者之间的联系;另一个是CC创作者与非CC创作者之间的联系。研究发现,与非CC用户相比,CC创建者在考虑资助其他CC创建者时表现出不同的支持模式。在考虑资助同伴CC创建者时,CC身份可以帮助他们分配和支持感知到的群体内成员;当考虑资助非cc创作者时,在竞争性项目类别中分享共同兴趣可能会引发竞争心态,使他们在看到潜在竞争对手时退缩。原创性/价值本研究有三个贡献。首先,它借鉴了多种理论框架来研究当众筹者承担创造者和资助者的双重角色时的独特动机,并提供了如何同时管理竞争和合作的启示。其次,通过网络分析,我们的研究不仅确定了集体行动的多重激励因素,而且展示了它们在众筹中的差异效应。第三,多种理论框架的整合为理论建设提供了机会。同行评议本文的同行评议历史可在:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0166。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信