Predictors of Heart Failure Caused by Volume Overload Using an Irrigation Catheter during Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

S. Taeko, Yoshimoto Issei, Oketani Naoya, Okui Hideki, Iriki Yasuhisa, Ichiki Hitoshi, Maenosono Ryuichi, Namino Fuminori, M. Miyata, Ohishi Mitsuru
{"title":"Predictors of Heart Failure Caused by Volume Overload Using an Irrigation Catheter during Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation","authors":"S. Taeko, Yoshimoto Issei, Oketani Naoya, Okui Hideki, Iriki Yasuhisa, Ichiki Hitoshi, Maenosono Ryuichi, Namino Fuminori, M. Miyata, Ohishi Mitsuru","doi":"10.23937/2378-2951/1410155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Predictors of heart failure caused by volume overload are unclear. This study to investigate the predictors of heart failure caused by volume overload using an irrigation catheter during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: This study included 431 consecutive patients with AF who underwent ablation in their first session from April 2009 to December 2015. According to right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) after AF ablation, patients were divided into high (≥ 40 mmHg, n = 62) or normal RVSP (< 40 mmHg, n = 312) groups. Results: There were significant differences in the rates of age ≥ 65-years-old (53.2% vs. 32.1%), history of congestive heart failure (16.1% vs. 8.0%), hypertension (67.7% vs. 50%), and diabetes mellitus (25.8% vs. 6.4%), as well as serum creatinine concentrations (0.92 vs. 0.83 mg/dl), B-type natriuretic peptide levels (165.9 vs. 109.0 pg/ml), left atrial dimension (44.4 vs. 41.0 mm), mitral inflow E wave velocity before ablation (E wave, 76.6 vs. 70.2 cm/sec), and the total amount of injection (3591 vs. 3282 ml) between the high and normal RVSP groups. There were no significant differences in sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and radiofrequency duration. Age ≥ 65-years-old (p = 0.004), history of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), left atrial dimension (p = 0.021), and E wave (p = 0.049) showed significant differences in multiple analysis between the high and normal RVSP groups. Conclusions: Close observation is mandatory with an older age, greater left atrial dimension and mitral E wave, and/or a history of diabetes mellitus to avoid heart failure after AF ablation using irrigation catheters.","PeriodicalId":112011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-2951/1410155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Predictors of heart failure caused by volume overload are unclear. This study to investigate the predictors of heart failure caused by volume overload using an irrigation catheter during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Methods: This study included 431 consecutive patients with AF who underwent ablation in their first session from April 2009 to December 2015. According to right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) after AF ablation, patients were divided into high (≥ 40 mmHg, n = 62) or normal RVSP (< 40 mmHg, n = 312) groups. Results: There were significant differences in the rates of age ≥ 65-years-old (53.2% vs. 32.1%), history of congestive heart failure (16.1% vs. 8.0%), hypertension (67.7% vs. 50%), and diabetes mellitus (25.8% vs. 6.4%), as well as serum creatinine concentrations (0.92 vs. 0.83 mg/dl), B-type natriuretic peptide levels (165.9 vs. 109.0 pg/ml), left atrial dimension (44.4 vs. 41.0 mm), mitral inflow E wave velocity before ablation (E wave, 76.6 vs. 70.2 cm/sec), and the total amount of injection (3591 vs. 3282 ml) between the high and normal RVSP groups. There were no significant differences in sex, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and radiofrequency duration. Age ≥ 65-years-old (p = 0.004), history of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), left atrial dimension (p = 0.021), and E wave (p = 0.049) showed significant differences in multiple analysis between the high and normal RVSP groups. Conclusions: Close observation is mandatory with an older age, greater left atrial dimension and mitral E wave, and/or a history of diabetes mellitus to avoid heart failure after AF ablation using irrigation catheters.
房颤导管消融期间使用灌洗导管导致容量过载心力衰竭的预测因素
背景:容量过载引起心力衰竭的预测因素尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨心房颤动(AF)消融术中使用灌管引起的容量过载引起的心力衰竭的预测因素。方法:本研究纳入了从2009年4月至2015年12月连续431例房颤患者,他们在第一期接受了消融治疗。根据房颤消融后右心室收缩压(RVSP)分为高(≥40 mmHg, n = 62)组和正常RVSP (< 40 mmHg, n = 312)组。结果:年龄≥65岁(53.2% vs. 32.1%)、有充血性心力衰竭(16.1% vs. 8.0%)、高血压(67.7% vs. 50%)、糖尿病(25.8% vs. 6.4%)、血清肌酐浓度(0.92 vs. 0.83 mg/dl)、b型利钠肽水平(165.9 vs. 109.0 pg/ml)、左心房尺寸(44.4 vs. 41.0 mm)、消融前二尖瓣内流E波速度(E波,76.6 vs. 70.2 cm/sec)、RVSP高、正常组总注射量(3591比3282 ml)。性别、体重指数、左心室射血分数和射频持续时间无显著差异。年龄≥65岁(p = 0.004)、糖尿病史(p < 0.001)、左心房尺寸(p = 0.021)、E波(p = 0.049)在RVSP高、正常组间多重分析差异均有统计学意义。结论:年龄较大、左房面积和二尖瓣E波较大和/或有糖尿病史的患者必须密切观察,以避免AF灌洗导管消融后心力衰竭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信