A SOFT COMPUTING APPROACH TO TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATION IN LAGOS METROPOLIS, NIGERIA

Olanrewaju Oluwafemi Akinfala, F. O. Ogunwolu, Chidi Onyedikam
{"title":"A SOFT COMPUTING APPROACH TO TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATION IN LAGOS METROPOLIS, NIGERIA","authors":"Olanrewaju Oluwafemi Akinfala, F. O. Ogunwolu, Chidi Onyedikam","doi":"10.33736/jcest.3821.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trip generation is an indispensable component of the four-stage transportation planning process because the subsequent three stages are predicated on its results.  Linear regression has been widely adopted to predict trips due to its simplicity and its outperformance of more sophisticated count models and in some cases, soft computing models. The efficacy of regression for estimating trip generation alongside Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Fuzzy Expert System (FES) was examined. The performance of each model was evaluated using metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Coefficient of Determination (R2) and the capability of predicting average trips. The R2 for Regression, ANN and FES were all 0.71. The MAE for Regression, FES and ANN were 0.56, 0.55 and 0.49 respectively. The MSE for Regression, ANN and FES were 1.15, 1.16 and 1.15 respectively. Finally, FES and ANN resulted in average trips of 4.5 in comparison to actual average trips of 4.51 per household,  while regression produced average trips of 4.51. ANN and FES are not superior alternatives to the linear regression model for trip generation modelling. The performance increments gained from adopting these models are marginal and the extra development and computational effort required to apply such sophisticated approaches may not be justified","PeriodicalId":346729,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/jcest.3821.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Trip generation is an indispensable component of the four-stage transportation planning process because the subsequent three stages are predicated on its results.  Linear regression has been widely adopted to predict trips due to its simplicity and its outperformance of more sophisticated count models and in some cases, soft computing models. The efficacy of regression for estimating trip generation alongside Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Fuzzy Expert System (FES) was examined. The performance of each model was evaluated using metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), Coefficient of Determination (R2) and the capability of predicting average trips. The R2 for Regression, ANN and FES were all 0.71. The MAE for Regression, FES and ANN were 0.56, 0.55 and 0.49 respectively. The MSE for Regression, ANN and FES were 1.15, 1.16 and 1.15 respectively. Finally, FES and ANN resulted in average trips of 4.5 in comparison to actual average trips of 4.51 per household,  while regression produced average trips of 4.51. ANN and FES are not superior alternatives to the linear regression model for trip generation modelling. The performance increments gained from adopting these models are marginal and the extra development and computational effort required to apply such sophisticated approaches may not be justified
尼日利亚拉各斯市区出行估算的软计算方法
行程生成是四阶段交通规划过程中不可缺少的组成部分,因为随后的三个阶段都是基于它的结果。线性回归由于其简单性和优于更复杂的计数模型以及在某些情况下的软计算模型,已被广泛用于预测行程。研究了回归与人工神经网络(ANN)和模糊专家系统(FES)相结合对行程生成的估计效果。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方误差(MSE)、决定系数(R2)和预测平均行程的能力等指标对每个模型的性能进行评估。回归、ANN和FES的R2均为0.71。回归MAE、FES和ANN分别为0.56、0.55和0.49。回归、ANN和FES的MSE分别为1.15、1.16和1.15。最后,FES和ANN得出的平均出行次数为4.5次,而实际平均出行次数为4.51次,而回归得出的平均出行次数为4.51次。对于行程生成建模,人工神经网络和FES并不是线性回归模型的最佳选择。通过采用这些模型获得的性能增量是微不足道的,并且应用这些复杂方法所需的额外开发和计算工作可能不合理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信