Why Amateurs?

C. Clotfelter
{"title":"Why Amateurs?","authors":"C. Clotfelter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.224758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the undeniable trend over time toward greater professionalization of so many activities, including those of government and nonprofit organizations, a significant amount of effort that advances social policy in the United States continues to be carried out by persons who receive little, if any, pay or who do work for which they were not professionally trained. Professor Clotfelter's article is the first of a special series of articles to be published in an upcoming issue of Law and Contemporary Problems by Duke University School of Law, addressing the question of whether it is good public policy to rely on and indeed to encourage service by such amateurs. Professor Clotfelter provides an important overview of the subject and its significance, identifying three major forms of amateur service in contemporary America: unpaid volunteering, enlisted work for service organizations, and service-learning in schools. He introduces three important questions facing our use of amateurs: How effective are amateurs in delivering services? What are the effects on participants? What are the political effects? He concludes by presenting an overview of the other articles to be published in the special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems.","PeriodicalId":275936,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.224758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Despite the undeniable trend over time toward greater professionalization of so many activities, including those of government and nonprofit organizations, a significant amount of effort that advances social policy in the United States continues to be carried out by persons who receive little, if any, pay or who do work for which they were not professionally trained. Professor Clotfelter's article is the first of a special series of articles to be published in an upcoming issue of Law and Contemporary Problems by Duke University School of Law, addressing the question of whether it is good public policy to rely on and indeed to encourage service by such amateurs. Professor Clotfelter provides an important overview of the subject and its significance, identifying three major forms of amateur service in contemporary America: unpaid volunteering, enlisted work for service organizations, and service-learning in schools. He introduces three important questions facing our use of amateurs: How effective are amateurs in delivering services? What are the effects on participants? What are the political effects? He concludes by presenting an overview of the other articles to be published in the special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems.
为什么业余爱好者呢?
尽管不可否认的趋势是,随着时间的推移,许多活动,包括政府和非营利组织的活动,都朝着更加专业化的方向发展,但在美国,推进社会政策的大量努力,仍然是由那些收入很少(如果有的话)或从事未经专业培训的工作的人进行的。Clotfelter教授的文章是杜克大学法学院即将出版的《法律与当代问题》(Law and Contemporary Problems)系列文章中的第一篇,该系列文章探讨的问题是,依赖并鼓励这些业余人士提供服务是否是一项好的公共政策。Clotfelter教授对这一主题及其意义进行了重要的概述,指出了当代美国业余服务的三种主要形式:无偿志愿服务、服务组织的志愿工作和学校的服务学习。他介绍了我们在使用业余人员时面临的三个重要问题:业余人员提供服务的效率如何?对参与者有什么影响?政治影响是什么?最后,他概述了将在《法律与当代问题》特刊上发表的其他文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信