Where’s the Time to Care? The Temporal Politics of Caring for Educational Technologies

Hong-An Wu
{"title":"Where’s the Time to Care? The Temporal Politics of Caring for Educational Technologies","authors":"Hong-An Wu","doi":"10.54916/rae.119493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing from my action research project teaching and learning modding digital games for social justice with teens in a library setting in the US Midwest, this paper examines repeated moments of technological troubles and its demand for care during teaching to trace the temporal politics of caring for educational technologies. Instead of disregarding moments of technological troubles in pedagogical encounters as irrelevant logistics, this paper centers these moments by attending to emerging digital technologies’ request for canimating these moments to unpack the temporal order negotiated, made, and remade through its commonplaceness in teaching practices. By reading moments of technological troubles through feminist science and technology studies scholarship on care, temporality, and technologies, I argue that my habituated teacher subjectivity that used lesson plans as a technology and my habituated networked subjectivity that used emerging digital technologies in mylesson plans structured a temporal order that was inhospitable towards emergent artistic knowledge production through practices of care. Yet, as these moments point toward a visible seam in the temporal order of technological progress, I contend that art educators are also invited to care for mending this seam that might lead to the knowledge of an alternative logic. To do so, I conclude by advocating for art educators to make the time to care throughrethinking lesson plans as educational technologies.","PeriodicalId":101879,"journal":{"name":"Research in Arts and Education","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Arts and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54916/rae.119493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing from my action research project teaching and learning modding digital games for social justice with teens in a library setting in the US Midwest, this paper examines repeated moments of technological troubles and its demand for care during teaching to trace the temporal politics of caring for educational technologies. Instead of disregarding moments of technological troubles in pedagogical encounters as irrelevant logistics, this paper centers these moments by attending to emerging digital technologies’ request for canimating these moments to unpack the temporal order negotiated, made, and remade through its commonplaceness in teaching practices. By reading moments of technological troubles through feminist science and technology studies scholarship on care, temporality, and technologies, I argue that my habituated teacher subjectivity that used lesson plans as a technology and my habituated networked subjectivity that used emerging digital technologies in mylesson plans structured a temporal order that was inhospitable towards emergent artistic knowledge production through practices of care. Yet, as these moments point toward a visible seam in the temporal order of technological progress, I contend that art educators are also invited to care for mending this seam that might lead to the knowledge of an alternative logic. To do so, I conclude by advocating for art educators to make the time to care throughrethinking lesson plans as educational technologies.
哪里有时间去关心?关心教育技术的时间政治
从我的行动研究项目教学和学习建模数字游戏的社会正义与青少年在美国中西部的图书馆设置,本文考察了技术问题的重复时刻及其在教学过程中对关怀的需求,以追踪关怀教育技术的时间政治。本文并没有将教学遭遇中的技术问题时刻视为无关的后勤,而是将这些时刻作为中心,关注新兴数字技术对激活这些时刻的要求,以通过其在教学实践中的普遍性来解开时间秩序的协商、制造和重塑。通过女权主义科学和技术研究关于关怀、时间性和技术的学术研究,我认为我习惯的教师主体性将课程计划作为一种技术,我习惯的网络主体性在课程计划中使用新兴的数字技术,构建了一种时间秩序,这种秩序不利于通过关怀实践产生新兴的艺术知识。然而,当这些时刻指向技术进步的时间秩序中一个可见的接缝时,我认为艺术教育者也被邀请去修补这个接缝,这可能会导致另一种逻辑的知识。为了做到这一点,我建议艺术教育者花时间来重新思考课程计划作为教育技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信