The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues

ERN: National Pub Date : 2021-07-07 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3881673
Abdulyakeen Abdulrasheed
{"title":"The Contestation of the Notion of Debt-Trap Diplomacy on Nigeria-China Relations: The Dilemma and Critical Issues","authors":"Abdulyakeen Abdulrasheed","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3881673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates loan agreements between Nigeria and China to unpack the myths and media frenzy surrounding the Chinese loans in Nigeria. It examines the veracity of the sovereignty clause in loan agreements. Using data generated from both primary and secondary sources and content analysis, it was realized that the hitherto poor infrastructural facilities in many African states have been given considerable facelifts due to the availability of loans from the Chinese government to fund their infrastructural developments. In the last decade, several countries across the continent including Nigeria, Zambia, and Angola have benefited from the infrastructure-related funds from the Chinese government. However, nuanced concerns have been raised by citizens across Africa following an allegation of certain clauses in the China loans that purportedly waive state’s sovereign immunity in case of default thereby granting Chinese companies or government legal rights to automatically take over the same infrastructural assets. The research findings reflect the fact that the narratives on the debt trap are just mere speculation without substantial evidence to prove the adverse effects arising therefrom to the sovereignty and economic stability of Nigerian state. The study conclude that the outright generalization on the debt trap in Nigeria-China relation cannot hold water because only time can substantiate one’s affirmative position or otherwise. The study finally recommends on the improve cooperation between the two countries on the bases of mutual and win-win cooperation on strategic areas of development that will enhance the aspirations of the two countries.","PeriodicalId":221919,"journal":{"name":"ERN: National","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3881673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper investigates loan agreements between Nigeria and China to unpack the myths and media frenzy surrounding the Chinese loans in Nigeria. It examines the veracity of the sovereignty clause in loan agreements. Using data generated from both primary and secondary sources and content analysis, it was realized that the hitherto poor infrastructural facilities in many African states have been given considerable facelifts due to the availability of loans from the Chinese government to fund their infrastructural developments. In the last decade, several countries across the continent including Nigeria, Zambia, and Angola have benefited from the infrastructure-related funds from the Chinese government. However, nuanced concerns have been raised by citizens across Africa following an allegation of certain clauses in the China loans that purportedly waive state’s sovereign immunity in case of default thereby granting Chinese companies or government legal rights to automatically take over the same infrastructural assets. The research findings reflect the fact that the narratives on the debt trap are just mere speculation without substantial evidence to prove the adverse effects arising therefrom to the sovereignty and economic stability of Nigerian state. The study conclude that the outright generalization on the debt trap in Nigeria-China relation cannot hold water because only time can substantiate one’s affirmative position or otherwise. The study finally recommends on the improve cooperation between the two countries on the bases of mutual and win-win cooperation on strategic areas of development that will enhance the aspirations of the two countries.
债务陷阱外交理念在尼中关系中的争论:困境与关键问题
本文调查了尼日利亚和中国之间的贷款协议,以解开围绕中国在尼日利亚贷款的神话和媒体狂热。考察贷款协议中主权条款的真实性。通过对一手和二手来源的数据以及内容分析,我们认识到,由于中国政府为基础设施建设提供了资金,许多非洲国家迄今为止较差的基础设施已经得到了相当大的改善。在过去的十年中,非洲大陆的几个国家,包括尼日利亚、赞比亚和安哥拉,都从中国政府的基础设施相关资金中受益。然而,在中国贷款中的某些条款据称在违约情况下放弃了国家主权豁免,从而赋予中国企业或政府自动接管相同基础设施资产的合法权利后,非洲各地的公民提出了细微的担忧。研究结果反映了这样一个事实,即关于债务陷阱的叙述仅仅是猜测,没有实质性的证据证明债务陷阱对尼日利亚国家主权和经济稳定产生的不利影响。该研究的结论是,对尼日利亚-中国关系中债务陷阱的全面概括是站不住脚的,因为只有时间才能证实一个人的肯定立场或其他立场。研究最后提出了两国在战略发展领域互利共赢的基础上加强合作的建议,这将增强两国的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信