Palaeozoic and Mesozoic palaeo–wildfires: An overview on advances in the 21st Century

A. Jasper, Ândrea Pozzebon-Silva, Júlia Siqueira Carniere, D. Uhl
{"title":"Palaeozoic and Mesozoic palaeo–wildfires: An overview on advances in the 21st Century","authors":"A. Jasper, Ândrea Pozzebon-Silva, Júlia Siqueira Carniere, D. Uhl","doi":"10.54991/jop.2021.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fire is a major driver for the evolution of biodiversity throughout the Phanerozoic and occurs in continental palaeoenvironments since the advent of the first land plants in the Silurian. The detection of palaeo–wildfire events can be based on different proxies, and charcoal is widely accepted as the most reliable evidence for such events in sedimentary layers. Although the identification of sedimentary charcoal as the product of incomplete combustion was the subject of controversial scientific discussions, palaeobotanical data can be used to confirm the pyrogenic origin of such material. In an overview on Palaeozoic and Mesozoic charcoal remains, differences in the number of published records can be detected for individual periods; including phases with both, lower (Silurian, Triassic, Jurassic) and higher (Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian, Cretaceous) numbers of published evidences for palaeo–wildfires. With the aim to discuss selected advances in palaeo–wildfire studies since the beginning of the 21st Century, we present an overview on the published occurrences of charcoal for an interval from the Silurian up to the Cretaceous. It was possible to confirm that a lack of detailed palaeobotanical data on the subject is detected in some intervals and regions, despite the high potential of occurrences detected in form of pyrogenic inertinites by coal petrographic studies. Although such temporal and regional gaps can be explained by taphonomic and palaeoenvironmental biases, it also indicates the scientific potential of future studies in diverse palaeogeographical and temporal settings.","PeriodicalId":383463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palaeosciences","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palaeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54991/jop.2021.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Fire is a major driver for the evolution of biodiversity throughout the Phanerozoic and occurs in continental palaeoenvironments since the advent of the first land plants in the Silurian. The detection of palaeo–wildfire events can be based on different proxies, and charcoal is widely accepted as the most reliable evidence for such events in sedimentary layers. Although the identification of sedimentary charcoal as the product of incomplete combustion was the subject of controversial scientific discussions, palaeobotanical data can be used to confirm the pyrogenic origin of such material. In an overview on Palaeozoic and Mesozoic charcoal remains, differences in the number of published records can be detected for individual periods; including phases with both, lower (Silurian, Triassic, Jurassic) and higher (Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian, Cretaceous) numbers of published evidences for palaeo–wildfires. With the aim to discuss selected advances in palaeo–wildfire studies since the beginning of the 21st Century, we present an overview on the published occurrences of charcoal for an interval from the Silurian up to the Cretaceous. It was possible to confirm that a lack of detailed palaeobotanical data on the subject is detected in some intervals and regions, despite the high potential of occurrences detected in form of pyrogenic inertinites by coal petrographic studies. Although such temporal and regional gaps can be explained by taphonomic and palaeoenvironmental biases, it also indicates the scientific potential of future studies in diverse palaeogeographical and temporal settings.
古生代和中生代古野火:21世纪研究进展综述
火是整个显生宙生物多样性进化的主要驱动力,自志留纪第一批陆地植物出现以来,火就发生在大陆古环境中。古野火事件的检测可以基于不同的代用物,木炭被广泛认为是沉积层中此类事件最可靠的证据。尽管将沉积炭鉴定为不完全燃烧的产物一直是有争议的科学讨论的主题,但古植物学数据可以用来确认这种物质的热成因。在古生代和中生代木炭遗迹概述中,可以发现各个时期已发表记录的数量存在差异;包括较低的(志留纪、三叠纪、侏罗纪)和较高的(泥盆纪、石炭纪、二叠纪、白垩纪)两个阶段的已发表的古野火证据。为了讨论自21世纪初以来古野火研究的一些进展,我们概述了从志留纪到白垩纪的一段时间内已发表的木炭出现情况。可以肯定的是,在一些区间和地区发现缺乏关于这一问题的详细古植物学数据,尽管通过煤岩学研究发现很有可能以热成因惰质的形式出现。虽然这种时间和区域差距可以用地貌学和古环境偏差来解释,但它也表明了未来在不同古地理和时间背景下研究的科学潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信