Competing on Price and Quality: Theory and Evidence from Trade Data

ERN: Monopoly Pub Date : 2019-07-10 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3401094
H. Atrianfar, Hamid Firooz
{"title":"Competing on Price and Quality: Theory and Evidence from Trade Data","authors":"H. Atrianfar, Hamid Firooz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3401094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Import competition induces firms either to reduce their markup, upgrade their quality, or both. Modern models of international trade typically consider one margin of adjustment to explain the consequences of import competition. However, examining U.S. import data suggests that firms actively respond by adjusting both quality and markup. This paper develops and calibrates a Ricardian model of trade which incorporates the endogenous response of quality and markup to import competition. Countries are heterogeneous both in physical efficiency and quality capability. Firms engage in a two-dimensional Bertrand competition in which they simultaneously choose the price and quality of output. Estimation results indicate that developed countries are more productive both in physical and quality production. Moreover, in response to import competition, developed countries mainly upgrade quality, while developing countries mainly reduce the markup. Ignoring the quality channel would underestimate the gains from trade that the U.S. derives with developed countries and overestimate the gains from trade with developing countries. The counterfactual experiment indicates as the U.S. economy grows, it benefits more from free trade with quality-capable countries than with countries which are less capable.","PeriodicalId":142139,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monopoly","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monopoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3401094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Import competition induces firms either to reduce their markup, upgrade their quality, or both. Modern models of international trade typically consider one margin of adjustment to explain the consequences of import competition. However, examining U.S. import data suggests that firms actively respond by adjusting both quality and markup. This paper develops and calibrates a Ricardian model of trade which incorporates the endogenous response of quality and markup to import competition. Countries are heterogeneous both in physical efficiency and quality capability. Firms engage in a two-dimensional Bertrand competition in which they simultaneously choose the price and quality of output. Estimation results indicate that developed countries are more productive both in physical and quality production. Moreover, in response to import competition, developed countries mainly upgrade quality, while developing countries mainly reduce the markup. Ignoring the quality channel would underestimate the gains from trade that the U.S. derives with developed countries and overestimate the gains from trade with developing countries. The counterfactual experiment indicates as the U.S. economy grows, it benefits more from free trade with quality-capable countries than with countries which are less capable.
价格与质量竞争:来自贸易数据的理论与证据
进口竞争促使企业要么降低加价,要么提高质量,或者两者兼而有之。现代国际贸易模型通常考虑一个调整幅度来解释进口竞争的后果。然而,对美国进口数据的研究表明,企业通过调整质量和加价来积极应对。本文发展并校准了一个李嘉图贸易模型,该模型包含了质量和价格对进口竞争的内生反应。各国在物质效率和质量能力方面存在差异。企业参与了一种二维的伯特兰竞争,在这种竞争中,他们同时选择产品的价格和质量。估计结果表明,发达国家在实物生产和质量生产方面的生产力更高。此外,针对进口竞争,发达国家以提升质量为主,发展中国家以降低加价为主。忽视质量渠道会低估美国与发达国家的贸易收益,高估与发展中国家的贸易收益。反事实实验表明,随着美国经济的增长,它从与质量有能力的国家的自由贸易中获益更多,而不是与质量较差的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信