Comparison of Static Code Analysis Tools

Matti Mantere, Ilkka Uusitalo, J. Röning
{"title":"Comparison of Static Code Analysis Tools","authors":"Matti Mantere, Ilkka Uusitalo, J. Röning","doi":"10.1109/SECURWARE.2009.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compare three static code analysis tools. The tools represent three different approaches in the field of static analysis: Fortify SCA is a non-annotation based heuristic analyzer, Splint represents an annotation based heuristic analyzer, and Frama-C an annotation based correct analyzer. The tools are compared by analysing their performance when checking a demonstration code with intentionally implemented errors.","PeriodicalId":382947,"journal":{"name":"2009 Third International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technologies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Third International Conference on Emerging Security Information, Systems and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECURWARE.2009.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

In this paper we compare three static code analysis tools. The tools represent three different approaches in the field of static analysis: Fortify SCA is a non-annotation based heuristic analyzer, Splint represents an annotation based heuristic analyzer, and Frama-C an annotation based correct analyzer. The tools are compared by analysing their performance when checking a demonstration code with intentionally implemented errors.
静态代码分析工具的比较
本文比较了三种静态代码分析工具。这些工具代表了静态分析领域的三种不同方法:Fortify SCA是一种非基于注释的启发式分析器,Splint是一种基于注释的启发式分析器,Frama-C是一种基于注释的正确分析器。当检查带有故意实现的错误的演示代码时,通过分析它们的性能来比较这些工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信