Razlike u prikupljanju migracijskih podataka: usporedba Hrvatske i odabranih europskih zemalja

Dario Pavić, Ida Ivanović
{"title":"Razlike u prikupljanju migracijskih podataka: usporedba Hrvatske i odabranih europskih zemalja","authors":"Dario Pavić, Ida Ivanović","doi":"10.11567/met.35.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the in of and remittances, -der, and of fertility, in the of the migration the most and demographic processes, standardised procedures between countries, international comparability of data. theory of migration does and we several perspectives. by two main processes. Firstly, since Croatian law is not unequivocal on the deadline for deregistration, many Croatian emigrants simply do not know when to deregister, in addition to not knowing how long they will stay in the country of immigration. Furthermore, there are negative consequences for deregistering. Croatian citizens would lose many health and social benefits in Croatia if they deregister. There is also evidence that the Croatian interior affairs and judicial system are not very efficient in punishing those that do not deregister. Secondly, most of the countries require registration at the end of three months, Germany even after 14 days. Since immigrants have more incentives to register in the new country, the numbers of immigrants are higher than those of emigrants from Croatian data. These numbers can also be mis-leading, as in the case of Germany, where there are many more annual emigrants to Croatia than the Croatian data reveal, meaning that people come and go to Germany several times annually. In conclusion, this research reveals the imperfections in the registration process, the differences in the logic and procedure of data acquisition, and dissemination, and different traditions of data acquisition throughout Europe. It is therefore of vital in-terest to harmonise the data gathering process by unifying the definitions of migra -tions, the registration process and data dissemination. For Croatia, the imperative is to adopt the concept of usual residence, to implement the population register and to change the laws on residence accordingly. The ideal for all European countries should be the cooperation between Nordic countries where the process of data shar ing is efficient and the statistics are fully comparable.","PeriodicalId":259479,"journal":{"name":"Migracijske i etničke teme / Migration and Ethnic Themes","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migracijske i etničke teme / Migration and Ethnic Themes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11567/met.35.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

the in of and remittances, -der, and of fertility, in the of the migration the most and demographic processes, standardised procedures between countries, international comparability of data. theory of migration does and we several perspectives. by two main processes. Firstly, since Croatian law is not unequivocal on the deadline for deregistration, many Croatian emigrants simply do not know when to deregister, in addition to not knowing how long they will stay in the country of immigration. Furthermore, there are negative consequences for deregistering. Croatian citizens would lose many health and social benefits in Croatia if they deregister. There is also evidence that the Croatian interior affairs and judicial system are not very efficient in punishing those that do not deregister. Secondly, most of the countries require registration at the end of three months, Germany even after 14 days. Since immigrants have more incentives to register in the new country, the numbers of immigrants are higher than those of emigrants from Croatian data. These numbers can also be mis-leading, as in the case of Germany, where there are many more annual emigrants to Croatia than the Croatian data reveal, meaning that people come and go to Germany several times annually. In conclusion, this research reveals the imperfections in the registration process, the differences in the logic and procedure of data acquisition, and dissemination, and different traditions of data acquisition throughout Europe. It is therefore of vital in-terest to harmonise the data gathering process by unifying the definitions of migra -tions, the registration process and data dissemination. For Croatia, the imperative is to adopt the concept of usual residence, to implement the population register and to change the laws on residence accordingly. The ideal for all European countries should be the cooperation between Nordic countries where the process of data shar ing is efficient and the statistics are fully comparable.
移民和汇款、移民和生育率、人口迁移过程、国家间的标准化程序、数据的国际可比性。移民理论,我们有几个观点。通过两个主要过程。首先,由于克罗地亚法律对撤销登记的最后期限没有明确规定,许多克罗地亚移民除了不知道他们将在移民国停留多久之外,根本不知道何时撤销登记。此外,注销还会产生负面后果。如果克罗地亚公民注销登记,他们将在克罗地亚失去许多保健和社会福利。还有证据表明,克罗地亚内政和司法系统在惩罚那些不注销登记的人方面效率不高。其次,大多数国家要求在三个月结束时注册,德国甚至在14天后。由于移民有更多动机在新国家登记,移民的数量要高于克罗地亚的移民数据。这些数字也可能会误导人,比如德国,每年移民到克罗地亚的人数比克罗地亚的数据显示的要多得多,这意味着人们每年来德国几次。综上所述,本研究揭示了整个欧洲在注册过程中的不完善之处、数据获取和传播的逻辑和程序的差异以及不同的数据获取传统。因此,通过统一迁移的定义、登记过程和数据传播来协调数据收集过程是至关重要的。对克罗地亚来说,当务之急是采用惯常居住的概念,执行人口登记,并相应地改变关于居住的法律。所有欧洲国家的理想应该是北欧国家之间的合作,因为北欧国家的数据共享过程是有效的,统计数据是完全可比较的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信