A Small Alpine Form: Studies in Nabokov's Short Fiction (review)

Maxim D. Shrayer
{"title":"A Small Alpine Form: Studies in Nabokov's Short Fiction (review)","authors":"Maxim D. Shrayer","doi":"10.1353/nab.2011.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"perspectives on Nabokov's works. But one can't help but wonder if they belong in an introductory study, aimed in part at giving new readers an entree into the mainstream understanding of the novelist and his novels. Third, and finally, Sharpe, like virtually all other Nabokovian commentators, is unable to resist the temptation to occasionally imitate the style of his subject. Much of the style of Vladimir Nabokov is clear and appropriate, and Sharpe is a healthy long way from the pseudo-Nabokovianisms of some of his predecessors. Still, at times, one wants to suggest leaving Nabokov's style to Nabokov. For example, it really isn't necessary to begin the study with a sentence about Nabokov's death, and to conclude the book with one on his birth. This was clever when Nabokov did it in his biography of Gogol, a bit cute the first time or two a critic tried it, and now just seems unnecessary. Or, when discussing John Shade's physical appearance, Professor Sharpe probably did not need to add the following footnote (cited in its entirety: \"I am struck by the similarity between this and the tribute of a recent biographer-obituarist recalling his first meeting with his future subject: 'Even then he was not slim, yet he carried about him an atmosphere of thinness' ( 7he Independent, Thursday 4 April 1991, p. 3)\" (91). Or this item from the Bibliography: \"There is much more written on Nabokov than is worth reading (with Kinbotian modesty I leave my reader to pass appropriate judgement on this book)...\" (112). These games are fun; most of us would not be the partisans of Nabokov if we did not enjoy them; still, the place for Kinbote is in Pale Fire, not in criticism of Pale Fire: the temptation should be resisted a bit more stoutly than Professor Sharpe manages. These are relatively small quibbles, indeed, and they do little to mar a useful book. Tony Sharpe's Vladimir Nabokov is a study which will be an appropriate door and eye opener for the beginner, and a stimulating discussion for the more experienced. To have accomplished either of these objectives is admirable, to have achieved both is impressive.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nabokov Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2011.0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

perspectives on Nabokov's works. But one can't help but wonder if they belong in an introductory study, aimed in part at giving new readers an entree into the mainstream understanding of the novelist and his novels. Third, and finally, Sharpe, like virtually all other Nabokovian commentators, is unable to resist the temptation to occasionally imitate the style of his subject. Much of the style of Vladimir Nabokov is clear and appropriate, and Sharpe is a healthy long way from the pseudo-Nabokovianisms of some of his predecessors. Still, at times, one wants to suggest leaving Nabokov's style to Nabokov. For example, it really isn't necessary to begin the study with a sentence about Nabokov's death, and to conclude the book with one on his birth. This was clever when Nabokov did it in his biography of Gogol, a bit cute the first time or two a critic tried it, and now just seems unnecessary. Or, when discussing John Shade's physical appearance, Professor Sharpe probably did not need to add the following footnote (cited in its entirety: "I am struck by the similarity between this and the tribute of a recent biographer-obituarist recalling his first meeting with his future subject: 'Even then he was not slim, yet he carried about him an atmosphere of thinness' ( 7he Independent, Thursday 4 April 1991, p. 3)" (91). Or this item from the Bibliography: "There is much more written on Nabokov than is worth reading (with Kinbotian modesty I leave my reader to pass appropriate judgement on this book)..." (112). These games are fun; most of us would not be the partisans of Nabokov if we did not enjoy them; still, the place for Kinbote is in Pale Fire, not in criticism of Pale Fire: the temptation should be resisted a bit more stoutly than Professor Sharpe manages. These are relatively small quibbles, indeed, and they do little to mar a useful book. Tony Sharpe's Vladimir Nabokov is a study which will be an appropriate door and eye opener for the beginner, and a stimulating discussion for the more experienced. To have accomplished either of these objectives is admirable, to have achieved both is impressive.
高山的小形式:纳博科夫短篇小说研究(评论)
对纳博科夫作品的观点。但人们不禁会想,它们是否属于介绍性研究,其部分目的是让新读者进入对这位小说家及其小说的主流理解。第三,也是最后一点,就像几乎所有其他纳博科夫评论家一样,夏普无法抗拒偶尔模仿他的主题风格的诱惑。弗拉基米尔·纳博科夫(Vladimir Nabokov)的许多风格清晰而恰当,夏普与他的一些前辈的伪纳博科夫主义相去甚远。尽管如此,有时人们还是想建议把纳博科夫的风格留给纳博科夫。例如,真的没有必要以纳博科夫之死的句子开始研究,并以他的出生来结束这本书。当纳博科夫在他的果戈理传记中这样做时,这是很聪明的,评论家第一次或两次尝试时有点可爱,现在似乎没有必要。或者,在讨论约翰·谢德的外貌时,夏普教授可能不需要加上下面的脚注(完整引用):“我对这一点与最近一位传记作者——讣告作者回忆他与他未来的主题的第一次会面时的颂词的相似之处感到震惊:‘即使在那时,他并不苗条,但他身上带着一种瘦弱的气氛’(《独立报》1991年4月4日星期四,第3页)。”(91)。或者参考书目中的这句话:“关于纳博科夫的文章太多了,不值得一读(出于金博式的谦虚,我让我的读者对这本书做出适当的判断)……”(112)。这些游戏很有趣;如果我们不欣赏纳博科夫的作品,我们大多数人就不会成为他的拥护者;尽管如此,金波特的位置还是在《苍白的火》中,而不是在《苍白的火》的批评中:应该比夏普教授更坚决地抵制这种诱惑。的确,这些都是相对较小的诡辩,对一本有用的书几乎没有什么影响。托尼夏普的弗拉基米尔纳博科夫是一个研究,将是一个合适的大门和大开眼界的初学者,和一个刺激的讨论,为更有经验的。实现这两个目标中的任何一个都是令人钦佩的,而同时实现这两个目标则令人印象深刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信