Should we offer total hip replacement to feline patients?

K. Smithers
{"title":"Should we offer total hip replacement to feline patients?","authors":"K. Smithers","doi":"10.18849/ve.v5i4.347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PICO question \nIn cats with traumatic coxofemoral injury, does total hip replacement (THR) offer improved outcome when compared with femoral head and neck excision (FHNE) arthroplasty? \n  \nClinical bottom line \nCategory of research question \nTreatment \nThe number and type of study designs reviewed \nOne paper was critically reviewed. It was a non-randomised retrospective observational study \nStrength of evidence \nModerate evidence \nOutcomes reported \nTHR results in superior clinical outcome and owner satisfaction compared to FHNE in cats \nConclusion \nIn cats with traumatic coxofemoral injury, although the evidence is not conclusive and somewhat limited, the literature reviewed here suggests that THR offers a superior outcome in feline patients. \nThere is currently insufficient evidence to determine if there is a difference in long-term outcome, complications or osteoarthritis (OA) development following THR or FHNE in feline patients \n  \nHow to apply this evidence in practice \nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. \nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care. \n  \n","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v5i4.347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PICO question In cats with traumatic coxofemoral injury, does total hip replacement (THR) offer improved outcome when compared with femoral head and neck excision (FHNE) arthroplasty?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed One paper was critically reviewed. It was a non-randomised retrospective observational study Strength of evidence Moderate evidence Outcomes reported THR results in superior clinical outcome and owner satisfaction compared to FHNE in cats Conclusion In cats with traumatic coxofemoral injury, although the evidence is not conclusive and somewhat limited, the literature reviewed here suggests that THR offers a superior outcome in feline patients. There is currently insufficient evidence to determine if there is a difference in long-term outcome, complications or osteoarthritis (OA) development following THR or FHNE in feline patients   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  
我们应该为猫病人提供全髋关节置换术吗?
对于外伤性髋部损伤的猫,与股骨头颈部切除(FHNE)关节置换术相比,全髋关节置换术(THR)是否能改善预后?临床底线研究问题类别治疗研究设计审查的数量和类型一篇论文被严格审查。这是一项非随机回顾性观察性研究证据强度中等证据结果报道,与猫的FHNE相比,THR的临床结果和饲主满意度都优于猫的FHNE结论对于患有外伤性髋股损伤的猫,尽管证据不是结论性的,而且有些有限,但本文回顾的文献表明,THR在猫患者中提供了更好的结果。目前尚无足够的证据来确定THR或FHNE对猫患者的长期预后、并发症或骨关节炎(OA)的发展是否有差异。如何在实践中应用这一证据。证据应用于实践应考虑多种因素,不限于:个人的临床专业知识,病人的情况和业主的价值观,你工作的国家,地点或诊所,你面前的个案,治疗和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或告知决策的资源。他们不会凌驾于从业者的责任或判断之上,去做对他们照顾的动物最好的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信