The Insubordination of Photography. Documentary Practices Under Chile's Dictatorship by Ángeles Donoso Macaya (review)

Gonzalo Montero
{"title":"The Insubordination of Photography. Documentary Practices Under Chile's Dictatorship by Ángeles Donoso Macaya (review)","authors":"Gonzalo Montero","doi":"10.1353/rvs.2021.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"six, “Fiction and Reality,” analyzes how, in highlighting its own constructed nature, contemporary Venezuelan fiction encourages its readers to question the official narratives and ideals promoted by the Bolivarian government. Brown masterfully weaves together her analysis of the novels and the cultural, political, and social context that frames them. She thus allows for her readers—whether they are familiar or not with the Venezuelan reality—to understand not only the operations of the Venezuelan literary system, but also how the novels discussed enter in a productive dialogue with broader debates regarding literary movements in Latin America, the relationship between literature and new technologies, and the subversive potential of metafiction. Though she offers a wellresearched and thorough account of the cultural policies that the Bolivarian Revolution introduced and often cites Sesto’s public statements, Chávez’s central role in shaping the Revolution’s cultural vision and his own experimentations with literature (which include the publication in 2012 of Cuentos del arañero) are mostly absent, only appearing briefly in chapter six. This omission productively challenges the often reductive and oversimplifying assumption that “Chávez is the Revolution”; however, it also overlooks the ways in which the novels are responding to Chávez’s own fictional rhetoric and the seemingly endless act of storytelling that framed his political performance. Overall, Brown’s work is an invaluable contribution to the study of contemporary Venezuelan literature that is certain to inspire other academic works on the topic, and that will appeal to readers interested not only in Venezuela and Venezuelan literature, but also in contemporary Latin American literature and the literature of the diaspora.","PeriodicalId":281386,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Hispánicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvs.2021.0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

six, “Fiction and Reality,” analyzes how, in highlighting its own constructed nature, contemporary Venezuelan fiction encourages its readers to question the official narratives and ideals promoted by the Bolivarian government. Brown masterfully weaves together her analysis of the novels and the cultural, political, and social context that frames them. She thus allows for her readers—whether they are familiar or not with the Venezuelan reality—to understand not only the operations of the Venezuelan literary system, but also how the novels discussed enter in a productive dialogue with broader debates regarding literary movements in Latin America, the relationship between literature and new technologies, and the subversive potential of metafiction. Though she offers a wellresearched and thorough account of the cultural policies that the Bolivarian Revolution introduced and often cites Sesto’s public statements, Chávez’s central role in shaping the Revolution’s cultural vision and his own experimentations with literature (which include the publication in 2012 of Cuentos del arañero) are mostly absent, only appearing briefly in chapter six. This omission productively challenges the often reductive and oversimplifying assumption that “Chávez is the Revolution”; however, it also overlooks the ways in which the novels are responding to Chávez’s own fictional rhetoric and the seemingly endless act of storytelling that framed his political performance. Overall, Brown’s work is an invaluable contribution to the study of contemporary Venezuelan literature that is certain to inspire other academic works on the topic, and that will appeal to readers interested not only in Venezuela and Venezuelan literature, but also in contemporary Latin American literature and the literature of the diaspora.
摄影的反抗。纪录片《智利独裁统治下的实践》Ángeles Donoso Macaya(评论)
第六篇“虚构与现实”(Fiction and Reality),分析当代委内瑞拉小说如何在强调自身建构性质的同时,鼓励读者质疑玻利瓦尔政府所提倡的官方叙述与理想。布朗巧妙地将她对小说的分析与构成小说的文化、政治和社会背景编织在一起。因此,她允许她的读者——无论他们是否熟悉委内瑞拉的现实——不仅了解委内瑞拉文学体系的运作,而且还了解所讨论的小说如何与拉丁美洲文学运动、文学与新技术之间的关系以及元小说的颠覆性潜力等更广泛的辩论进行富有成效的对话。虽然她对玻利瓦尔革命引入的文化政策进行了深入的研究,并经常引用Sesto的公开声明,但Chávez在塑造革命文化愿景方面的核心作用以及他自己对文学的实验(包括2012年出版的Cuentos del arañero)大部分都没有出现,只在第六章中短暂出现。这种遗漏有效地挑战了通常简化和过度简化的假设,即“Chávez是革命”;然而,它也忽略了这些小说对Chávez自己的虚构修辞和看似无休止的讲故事行为的回应方式,这些行为构成了他的政治表现。总的来说,布朗的作品对当代委内瑞拉文学的研究是一个无价的贡献,肯定会激发其他关于这个主题的学术著作,这将吸引读者,不仅对委内瑞拉和委内瑞拉文学感兴趣,而且对当代拉丁美洲文学和流散的文学感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信