Comparison of Handwritten Recognition Methods on Arabic and Latin Characters

M. Tutar
{"title":"Comparison of Handwritten Recognition Methods on Arabic and Latin Characters","authors":"M. Tutar","doi":"10.53898/josse2022232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, both machine learning techniques and deep learning methods were applied on the digit datasets created using the Arabic and Latin alphabets, and the performances of the methods were compared. Each method was tested with various parameters and the results were analyzed. In addition, with this study, the recognizability of handwritten numeral datasets created using different alphabets was also observed. For experiments, an Arabic alphabet handwritten digit dataset (60,000 training and 10,000 testings) and a Latin alphabet handwritten digit dataset (60,000 training and 10,000 testings) were used. When the results of the experiment are examined, it is seen that successful results are obtained in the classification made with the MADBase dataset in some methods and in the classification made with the MNIST dataset in some methods. As a result, it can be stated that the handwriting character recognition success of a method cannot be measured only by the classification made on a dataset. Also, the digits written in the Arabic alphabet appear to be almost more recognizable than the digits written in the Latin alphabet.","PeriodicalId":388003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Studies in Science and Engineering","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Studies in Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53898/josse2022232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, both machine learning techniques and deep learning methods were applied on the digit datasets created using the Arabic and Latin alphabets, and the performances of the methods were compared. Each method was tested with various parameters and the results were analyzed. In addition, with this study, the recognizability of handwritten numeral datasets created using different alphabets was also observed. For experiments, an Arabic alphabet handwritten digit dataset (60,000 training and 10,000 testings) and a Latin alphabet handwritten digit dataset (60,000 training and 10,000 testings) were used. When the results of the experiment are examined, it is seen that successful results are obtained in the classification made with the MADBase dataset in some methods and in the classification made with the MNIST dataset in some methods. As a result, it can be stated that the handwriting character recognition success of a method cannot be measured only by the classification made on a dataset. Also, the digits written in the Arabic alphabet appear to be almost more recognizable than the digits written in the Latin alphabet.
阿拉伯文与拉丁文手写识别方法之比较
本文将机器学习技术和深度学习方法应用于由阿拉伯字母和拉丁字母创建的数字数据集,并比较了两种方法的性能。用不同的参数对每种方法进行了测试,并对结果进行了分析。此外,本研究还观察了使用不同字母创建的手写数字数据集的可识别性。实验中,使用了阿拉伯字母手写数字数据集(60,000次训练和10,000次测试)和拉丁字母手写数字数据集(60,000次训练和10,000次测试)。通过对实验结果的检验,可以看出,在MADBase数据集和MNIST数据集的分类中,有一些方法获得了成功的结果。因此,可以这样说,一种方法的手写字符识别成功与否不能仅仅通过对数据集进行分类来衡量。此外,用阿拉伯字母书写的数字似乎比用拉丁字母书写的数字更容易辨认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书