How Reliable is a J-sign Severity Scale When Assessing Lateral Patellar Instability?

Oksana Klimenko, T. Sousa, Ryan Baker, J. Carl, S. Mader, Kristopher Holden, M. McMulkin
{"title":"How Reliable is a J-sign Severity Scale When Assessing Lateral Patellar Instability?","authors":"Oksana Klimenko, T. Sousa, Ryan Baker, J. Carl, S. Mader, Kristopher Holden, M. McMulkin","doi":"10.55275/jposna-2023-630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patellar instability is a common cause of anterior knee pain and can limit function and sports participation. To help assess patellar instability, the clinical J-sign test consists of observing the patella translate laterally in the shape of an inverted J over the anterolateral femur proximal to the trochlear groove during active knee extension. Only positive or negative categorization of the J-sign test has typically been used without rating the severity. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a proposed grading/severity scale of the J-sign test. Methods: A scale for J-sign severity was developed as follows: grade 0: ≤1 quadrant of translation; grade 1: >1quadrant of translation; grade 2: >2 quadrants of translation; grade 3: complete patellofemoral dislocation; grade 4: unable to complete J-sign due to pain or apprehension. This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed J-sign ratings (0 to 4) from videos of patients undergoing evaluation for patellar instability. Six healthcare professionals rated the severity of the J-sign using the proposed scale, two different times, for all knees presented in random order. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were calculated using a Fleiss Kappa, k. Results: Forty-four patients (87 knees) ages 10-18 were included in this study. Both knees were rated, including unaffected knees to serve as a control. The proposed standardized grading scale for the J-sign had fair agreement for inter-observer reliability, k = 0.31, and moderate agreement for intra-observer reliability, k = 0.58. Conclusion: The proposed scale for determining J-sign severity yielded fair inter-observer reliability moderate intra-observer reliability, similar to the Kappa scores evaluating only the presence or absence of the J-sign. Further study into developing a standardized scale for J-sign severity grading might improve clinical descriptors of the test, and expand on other factors including clarity of knee extension ability, video standardization, and training materials.","PeriodicalId":412478,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55275/jposna-2023-630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patellar instability is a common cause of anterior knee pain and can limit function and sports participation. To help assess patellar instability, the clinical J-sign test consists of observing the patella translate laterally in the shape of an inverted J over the anterolateral femur proximal to the trochlear groove during active knee extension. Only positive or negative categorization of the J-sign test has typically been used without rating the severity. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a proposed grading/severity scale of the J-sign test. Methods: A scale for J-sign severity was developed as follows: grade 0: ≤1 quadrant of translation; grade 1: >1quadrant of translation; grade 2: >2 quadrants of translation; grade 3: complete patellofemoral dislocation; grade 4: unable to complete J-sign due to pain or apprehension. This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed J-sign ratings (0 to 4) from videos of patients undergoing evaluation for patellar instability. Six healthcare professionals rated the severity of the J-sign using the proposed scale, two different times, for all knees presented in random order. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were calculated using a Fleiss Kappa, k. Results: Forty-four patients (87 knees) ages 10-18 were included in this study. Both knees were rated, including unaffected knees to serve as a control. The proposed standardized grading scale for the J-sign had fair agreement for inter-observer reliability, k = 0.31, and moderate agreement for intra-observer reliability, k = 0.58. Conclusion: The proposed scale for determining J-sign severity yielded fair inter-observer reliability moderate intra-observer reliability, similar to the Kappa scores evaluating only the presence or absence of the J-sign. Further study into developing a standardized scale for J-sign severity grading might improve clinical descriptors of the test, and expand on other factors including clarity of knee extension ability, video standardization, and training materials.
在评估外侧髌骨不稳时,j标志严重程度量表有多可靠?
背景:髌骨不稳是膝关节前侧疼痛的常见原因,可限制功能和运动参与。为了帮助评估髌骨不稳定性,临床J征测试包括观察膝关节主动伸展时髌骨在滑车沟近端的股骨前外侧呈倒J形向外平移。通常只使用j符号测试的阳性或阴性分类,而不对严重程度进行评级。本研究的目的是评估拟议的j符号测试分级/严重程度量表的观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。方法:制定j符号严重程度量表:0级:≤1象限翻译;1级:>翻译1象限;二级:>2象限翻译;3级:完全性髌股脱位;4级:因疼痛或恐惧而无法完成j字型。这项回顾性横断面研究评估了接受髌骨不稳评估的患者的录像中的j征评分(0到4)。六名医疗保健专业人员使用建议的量表,在两个不同的时间,对所有随机排列的膝盖进行j标志的严重程度评分。使用Fleiss Kappa, k计算观察者之间和观察者内部的信度。结果:44名年龄在10-18岁的患者(87个膝关节)被纳入本研究。对两个膝盖进行评分,包括未受影响的膝盖作为对照。所提出的j符号标准化评分量表在观察者间信度上具有一般一致性,k = 0.31,在观察者内部信度上具有中等一致性,k = 0.58。结论:所提出的用于确定j符号严重程度的量表产生了公平的观察者间信度和适度的观察者内信度,类似于仅评估j符号存在或不存在的Kappa评分。进一步研究制定j标志严重程度分级的标准化量表,可能会改善测试的临床描述,并扩展其他因素,包括膝关节伸展能力的清晰度、视频标准化和训练材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信