{"title":"Aligning glocal agendas for international education","authors":"K. Båge, Albin Gaunt, J. Valcke","doi":"10.3828/ejlp.2021.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn recent years, there has been growing interest amongst universities around the world on reflecting upon the contribution of higher education to a global society and exploring ways to broaden the curriculum to enable students to make a meaningful contribution to the world (de Wit et al. 2015). This paper will suggest that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are at the centre of centripetal forces behind global and local agendas, as well as at the centre of centrifugal forces behind English-Medium Education (EME) that have provided friction favourable to enhancing the quality of education and initiate curricular reform at Karolinska Institutet (KI).\nAt the global level, quality education has been defined by the United Nations through the universally adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to be one that purposefully includes inclusion, global citizenship, appreciation of cultural diversity and culture’s contribution to sustainable development (UNESCO 2017). Nationally, the Swedish Ministry of Education’s internationalisation inquiry (Bladh et al. 2018) specifically links internationalisation to quality and to the integration of international understanding and intercultural competence in the curriculum. Locally, this has created conditions favourable for HEIs to align new strategic plans with this understanding of quality, bringing internationalisation to the forefront of their education programmes.\nAt the same time, the introduction of EME in HE has acted as a catalyst for transforming pedagogy to support the acquisition of twenty-first-century skills (Coyle 2013; Dafouz and Smit 2020; Valcke and Wilkinson 2017). The question of language in HE, in combination with the necessary adaptation to global agendas, has thus led university teachers to consider the pedagogical, linguistic and cultural implications of their practices as they have never done before. Focusing on KI as a case in point, this paper attempts to address what the convergence of policies, from the global to the local, with classroom practices means for developing quality EME at university.","PeriodicalId":104583,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Language Policy: Volume 13, Issue 2","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Language Policy: Volume 13, Issue 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2021.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In recent years, there has been growing interest amongst universities around the world on reflecting upon the contribution of higher education to a global society and exploring ways to broaden the curriculum to enable students to make a meaningful contribution to the world (de Wit et al. 2015). This paper will suggest that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are at the centre of centripetal forces behind global and local agendas, as well as at the centre of centrifugal forces behind English-Medium Education (EME) that have provided friction favourable to enhancing the quality of education and initiate curricular reform at Karolinska Institutet (KI).
At the global level, quality education has been defined by the United Nations through the universally adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to be one that purposefully includes inclusion, global citizenship, appreciation of cultural diversity and culture’s contribution to sustainable development (UNESCO 2017). Nationally, the Swedish Ministry of Education’s internationalisation inquiry (Bladh et al. 2018) specifically links internationalisation to quality and to the integration of international understanding and intercultural competence in the curriculum. Locally, this has created conditions favourable for HEIs to align new strategic plans with this understanding of quality, bringing internationalisation to the forefront of their education programmes.
At the same time, the introduction of EME in HE has acted as a catalyst for transforming pedagogy to support the acquisition of twenty-first-century skills (Coyle 2013; Dafouz and Smit 2020; Valcke and Wilkinson 2017). The question of language in HE, in combination with the necessary adaptation to global agendas, has thus led university teachers to consider the pedagogical, linguistic and cultural implications of their practices as they have never done before. Focusing on KI as a case in point, this paper attempts to address what the convergence of policies, from the global to the local, with classroom practices means for developing quality EME at university.
近年来,世界各地的大学越来越有兴趣反思高等教育对全球社会的贡献,并探索拓宽课程的方法,使学生能够对世界做出有意义的贡献(de Wit et al. 2015)。本文将表明,高等教育机构(HEIs)是全球和地方议程背后的向心力的中心,也是英语媒介教育(EME)背后的离心力的中心,这些离心力为提高教育质量和启动卡罗林斯卡学院(KI)的课程改革提供了有利的摩擦。在全球层面,联合国通过普遍通过的可持续发展目标(sdg)对优质教育进行了定义,有目的地包括包容、全球公民意识、欣赏文化多样性和文化对可持续发展的贡献(教科文组织,2017年)。在全国范围内,瑞典教育部的国际化调查(Bladh et al. 2018)特别将国际化与课程质量以及国际理解和跨文化能力的整合联系起来。在本地,这为高等教育院校创造了有利条件,使其能够将新的战略计划与这种对质量的理解结合起来,将国际化置于其教育课程的最前沿。与此同时,在高等教育中引入EME已经成为转变教学法的催化剂,以支持21世纪技能的获得(Coyle 2013;Dafouz and Smit 2020;Valcke and Wilkinson 2017)。高等教育中的语言问题,结合对全球议程的必要适应,导致大学教师以前所未有的方式考虑其实践的教学、语言和文化含义。本文以KI为例,试图探讨从全球到地方的政策趋同与课堂实践对于在大学发展高质量的环境管理意味着什么。