Safety Engineering for Autonomous Vehicles

R. Adler, Patrik Feth, D. Schneider
{"title":"Safety Engineering for Autonomous Vehicles","authors":"R. Adler, Patrik Feth, D. Schneider","doi":"10.1109/DSN-W.2016.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In safety engineering for non-autonomous vehicles, it is generally assumed that safety is achieved if the vehicle appropriately follows certain control commands from humans such as steering or acceleration commands. This fundamental assumption becomes problematic if we consider autonomous vehicles that decide on their own which behavior is most reasonable in which situation. Safety criticality extends to the decision-making process and the related perception of the environment. These, however, are so complex that they require the application of concepts for intelligence that do not harmonize with traditional safety engineering. In this paper, we investigate these problems and propose a solution.","PeriodicalId":184154,"journal":{"name":"2016 46th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 46th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN-W.2016.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

In safety engineering for non-autonomous vehicles, it is generally assumed that safety is achieved if the vehicle appropriately follows certain control commands from humans such as steering or acceleration commands. This fundamental assumption becomes problematic if we consider autonomous vehicles that decide on their own which behavior is most reasonable in which situation. Safety criticality extends to the decision-making process and the related perception of the environment. These, however, are so complex that they require the application of concepts for intelligence that do not harmonize with traditional safety engineering. In this paper, we investigate these problems and propose a solution.
自动驾驶汽车的安全工程
在非自动驾驶车辆的安全工程中,通常假设如果车辆适当地遵循人类的某些控制命令(如转向或加速命令),则可以实现安全。如果我们考虑到自动驾驶汽车在哪种情况下自己决定哪种行为是最合理的,那么这个基本假设就会出现问题。安全关键性延伸到决策过程和对环境的相关感知。然而,这些问题是如此复杂,以至于它们需要应用与传统安全工程不协调的智能概念。本文对这些问题进行了研究,并提出了解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信