Systems Engineering and Project Management: Points of Intersection, Overlaps, and Tensions

J. W. Boswell, F. T. Anbari, John W. Via
{"title":"Systems Engineering and Project Management: Points of Intersection, Overlaps, and Tensions","authors":"J. W. Boswell, F. T. Anbari, John W. Via","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are significant Points of Intersection and Overlaps between Project / Program Managers (PMs) and the Chief Systems Engineer (CSE) / Systems Engineers (SE). In some projects, the PM is the Technical Lead, or the CSE is the PM, regardless of Role, the project leader is responsible for project success through adherence to the \"Golden Triangle.\" However, if Roles and Responsibilities are not clearly defined early in the project lifecycle when both professions are present, this can lead to unproductive tensions between PMs and the CSE that can be an impediment to project / program performance. Key sources of unproductive tensions are the lack of integrated planning, lack of or unclear communications, unclear definition roles and authority, and conflicting practices between the two overlapping roles. We address relevant causes of unproductive tensions, highlight the importance of collaboration between project management and systems engineering, describe the points of intersection and overlaps in the core competencies between the disciplines, as described by their respective profession organizations (PMI & INCOSE), and explore the Overlaps between the educational curricula for an M.S. in Project Management and an M.S. in Systems Engineering. We then suggest promising practices for enhancing effective integration between the two disciplines with the aim of improving project and program performance.","PeriodicalId":438177,"journal":{"name":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

There are significant Points of Intersection and Overlaps between Project / Program Managers (PMs) and the Chief Systems Engineer (CSE) / Systems Engineers (SE). In some projects, the PM is the Technical Lead, or the CSE is the PM, regardless of Role, the project leader is responsible for project success through adherence to the "Golden Triangle." However, if Roles and Responsibilities are not clearly defined early in the project lifecycle when both professions are present, this can lead to unproductive tensions between PMs and the CSE that can be an impediment to project / program performance. Key sources of unproductive tensions are the lack of integrated planning, lack of or unclear communications, unclear definition roles and authority, and conflicting practices between the two overlapping roles. We address relevant causes of unproductive tensions, highlight the importance of collaboration between project management and systems engineering, describe the points of intersection and overlaps in the core competencies between the disciplines, as described by their respective profession organizations (PMI & INCOSE), and explore the Overlaps between the educational curricula for an M.S. in Project Management and an M.S. in Systems Engineering. We then suggest promising practices for enhancing effective integration between the two disciplines with the aim of improving project and program performance.
系统工程和项目管理:交叉点、重叠点和紧张点
在项目/计划经理(pm)和首席系统工程师(CSE) /系统工程师(SE)之间有重要的交叉点和重叠点。在一些项目中,PM是技术领导,或者CSE是PM,不管角色是什么,项目领导通过坚持“金三角”来对项目的成功负责。然而,如果角色和职责在项目生命周期的早期没有明确定义,当这两种职业都存在时,这可能导致项目经理和CSE之间的非生产性紧张关系,这可能成为项目/计划绩效的障碍。非生产性紧张关系的主要来源是缺乏综合规划、缺乏或不明确的沟通、不明确的角色和权威定义,以及两个重叠角色之间相互冲突的实践。我们解决了导致非生产性紧张关系的相关原因,强调了项目管理和系统工程之间合作的重要性,描述了学科之间核心竞争力的交叉点和重叠点,正如他们各自的专业组织(PMI和INCOSE)所描述的那样,并探索了项目管理硕士和系统工程硕士的教育课程之间的重叠。然后,我们建议有希望的实践,以提高两个学科之间的有效集成,以提高项目和规划的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信