Locator versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems for Single Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture (Retention -Oral health related quality of life)

Mostafa I. Fayad, M. Osman, D. Haddad, M. A. Quassemc
{"title":"Locator versus Ball and Socket Attachment Systems for Single Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture (Retention -Oral health related quality of life)","authors":"Mostafa I. Fayad, M. Osman, D. Haddad, M. A. Quassemc","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2019.76476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: It was to compare Locator versus ball and socket attachment systems for single implant retained mandibular overdenture in relation to retention and oral health related quality of life. Subjects and Methods: Twenty completely edentulous patients were randomly selected from the Outpatient Clinic.  Patients were divided into two groups, group (I) received single implant retained overdenture with ball and socket attachment while group (II) received single implant retained overdenture with locator attachment. Retention was measured three months interval after overdenture insertion for one year using force gauge device. Oral healthrelated quality of life was evaluated using OHIP-EDENT questionnaire after one year of overdenture insertion. Results: Group (II) recorded higher retention values than group (I) and the difference was statistically  significant. Group I recorded higher Oral healthrelated quality of life mean values than group II and the difference was statistically non- significant.  Conclusion: Locator attachment significantly increases retention of implant retained overdenture than ball and socket attachment. There is no significant difference in Patient oral health and quality of life between locator and ball attachments.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2019.76476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: It was to compare Locator versus ball and socket attachment systems for single implant retained mandibular overdenture in relation to retention and oral health related quality of life. Subjects and Methods: Twenty completely edentulous patients were randomly selected from the Outpatient Clinic.  Patients were divided into two groups, group (I) received single implant retained overdenture with ball and socket attachment while group (II) received single implant retained overdenture with locator attachment. Retention was measured three months interval after overdenture insertion for one year using force gauge device. Oral healthrelated quality of life was evaluated using OHIP-EDENT questionnaire after one year of overdenture insertion. Results: Group (II) recorded higher retention values than group (I) and the difference was statistically  significant. Group I recorded higher Oral healthrelated quality of life mean values than group II and the difference was statistically non- significant.  Conclusion: Locator attachment significantly increases retention of implant retained overdenture than ball and socket attachment. There is no significant difference in Patient oral health and quality of life between locator and ball attachments.
定位器与球窝附着系统在单种植体固位下颌覆盖义齿中的比较(固位-口腔健康相关的生活质量)
目的:比较定位器与球窝附着系统在单种植下颌覆盖义齿固位和口腔健康相关生活质量方面的关系。对象与方法:随机选取门诊全牙缺牙患者20例。患者分为两组,I组采用单种植体固位覆盖义齿球窝附着体,II组采用定位器附着体单种植体固位覆盖义齿。在覆盖义齿植入一年后,使用力计装置每隔三个月测量固位。采用OHIP-EDENT问卷对患者在种植覆盖义齿一年后的口腔健康相关生活质量进行评估。结果:(II)组留置值高于(I)组,差异有统计学意义。第一组口腔健康相关生活质量均值高于第二组,差异无统计学意义。结论:定位器附着体比球窝附着体能显著提高种植固位覆盖义齿固位。定位器与球附着体在患者口腔健康及生活质量方面无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信