Sustainability and planning law in Australia: achievements and challenges

P. Williams, Angelique Williams
{"title":"Sustainability and planning law in Australia: achievements and challenges","authors":"P. Williams, Angelique Williams","doi":"10.1108/IJLBE-06-2016-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nSince 1992, all levels of government in Australia have pursued a policy of ecologically sustainable development (ESD). Crafted in response to the World Commission on Environment and Development 1987 report Our Common Future (the Brundtland Report), the principles contained in the Australian Government’s National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development have been progressively implemented at the national, state and local levels of government. The purpose of this paper is not only to track the implementation of these principles, through both policy and law in Australia, but also to highlight recent challenges to the concept of ESD using the state of New South Wales (NSW) as a case study. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nBeginning with a description of the Australian concept of ESD, this paper first examines the implementation of ESD through both policy and legislation at the national level. The state of NSW is then selected for more detailed assessment, with examples of key State government legislation and court decisions considered. Equal emphasis is placed on both the achievements in ESD policy development and implementation through legislation, statutory planning procedures and litigation, as well as the challenges that have confronted the pursuit of ESD in NSW. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nSince its introduction in 1992, the concept of ESD has matured into a key guiding principle for development and environmental decision-making in Australia. However, in recent years, ESD has been the target of significant challenge by some areas of government. Noteworthy among these challenges has been a failed attempt by the NSW Government to introduce new planning legislation which sought to replace ESD with the arguably weaker concept of “sustainable development”. Apparent from this episode is strong community and institutional support for robust sustainability provisions “manifested through ESD” within that State’s statutory planning system. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis paper provides an overview of the implementation of ESD in Australia within both a broader international context of sustainable development and specific instances of domestic interpretation and application. It extends this analysis by examining recent public policy attempts to reposition sustainability in the context of statutory planning system reform in NSW.","PeriodicalId":158465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in The Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-06-2016-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Since 1992, all levels of government in Australia have pursued a policy of ecologically sustainable development (ESD). Crafted in response to the World Commission on Environment and Development 1987 report Our Common Future (the Brundtland Report), the principles contained in the Australian Government’s National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development have been progressively implemented at the national, state and local levels of government. The purpose of this paper is not only to track the implementation of these principles, through both policy and law in Australia, but also to highlight recent challenges to the concept of ESD using the state of New South Wales (NSW) as a case study. Design/methodology/approach Beginning with a description of the Australian concept of ESD, this paper first examines the implementation of ESD through both policy and legislation at the national level. The state of NSW is then selected for more detailed assessment, with examples of key State government legislation and court decisions considered. Equal emphasis is placed on both the achievements in ESD policy development and implementation through legislation, statutory planning procedures and litigation, as well as the challenges that have confronted the pursuit of ESD in NSW. Findings Since its introduction in 1992, the concept of ESD has matured into a key guiding principle for development and environmental decision-making in Australia. However, in recent years, ESD has been the target of significant challenge by some areas of government. Noteworthy among these challenges has been a failed attempt by the NSW Government to introduce new planning legislation which sought to replace ESD with the arguably weaker concept of “sustainable development”. Apparent from this episode is strong community and institutional support for robust sustainability provisions “manifested through ESD” within that State’s statutory planning system. Originality/value This paper provides an overview of the implementation of ESD in Australia within both a broader international context of sustainable development and specific instances of domestic interpretation and application. It extends this analysis by examining recent public policy attempts to reposition sustainability in the context of statutory planning system reform in NSW.
澳大利亚的可持续性和规划法:成就与挑战
自1992年以来,澳大利亚各级政府一直奉行生态可持续发展(ESD)政策。澳大利亚政府的《生态可持续发展国家战略》所载原则是根据世界环境与发展委员会1987年的报告《我们的共同未来》(布伦特兰报告)拟订的,已在国家、州和地方各级政府逐步执行。本文的目的不仅是通过政策和法律跟踪这些原则在澳大利亚的实施情况,而且还以新南威尔士州(NSW)为例,强调可持续发展教育概念最近面临的挑战。设计/方法/方法本文首先介绍了澳大利亚的“可持续发展教育”概念,然后从国家层面的政策和立法两方面考察了可持续发展教育的实施情况。然后选择新南威尔士州进行更详细的评估,并考虑了关键州政府立法和法院判决的例子。同时强调了通过立法、法定规划程序和诉讼在可持续发展教育政策制定和实施方面取得的成就,以及在新南威尔士州追求可持续发展教育所面临的挑战。自1992年推出以来,可持续发展教育的概念已经成熟,成为澳大利亚发展和环境决策的重要指导原则。然而,近年来,公共服务电子化一直是政府某些领域面临的重大挑战。值得注意的是,在这些挑战中,新南威尔士州政府试图引入新的规划立法,试图用“可持续发展”这一可能较弱的概念取代“可持续发展”,但却失败了。从这一事件中可以明显看出,在该州的法定规划体系中,社区和机构对强有力的可持续发展规定给予了强有力的支持。本文概述了澳大利亚在可持续发展的更广泛国际背景下实施可持续发展教育的情况,以及国内解释和应用的具体实例。它通过检查最近的公共政策尝试在新南威尔士州的法定规划制度改革背景下重新定位可持续性,扩展了这一分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信