COMPILATION OF AVAILABLE SEISMOTECTONIC DATA FOR NORTH MACEDONIA AS AN INPUT FOR PSHA

Zabedin Neziri, Radmila Salic Makreska
{"title":"COMPILATION OF AVAILABLE SEISMOTECTONIC DATA FOR NORTH MACEDONIA AS AN INPUT FOR PSHA","authors":"Zabedin Neziri, Radmila Salic Makreska","doi":"10.5592/co/2crocee.2023.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"N. Macedonia is a country characterized by relatively high seismic activity. As a consequence of its special tectonic regime, and quite frequent occurrence of damaging earthquakes, necessity for reliable seismic hazard and risk assessments are of outmost importance. Initial and one of the most important steps in PSHA is the seismic source characterization. Previously used seismic hazard models at the national level (Mihailov, 1978; Milutinovic et al., 1998; Dojcinovski, 2005; Stamatovska and Koytcheva, 2013; Salic, 2015; Milutinovic et al., 2016) consisted in areal type and/or gridded seismicity sources (Salic, 2015; Milutinovic et al., 2016), owing to the lack of seismogenic active fault parameters. All up to date available national (Basic Geological Map 1:100.000; Arsovski and Petkovski, 1975; Janchevski, 1987; Petkovski, 1992; Arsovski, 1997; Dumurdzanov et al., 2005; Drogreshka, 2018) and regional and European (EDSF13 and EFSM20) fault parametrization data were summarized and comparatively analysed. Three main declustered catalogues of earthquakes (National Seismological Observatory, BSHAP project, and ESHM20-Unified Earthquake Catalogue) for the territory of N. Macedonia and border region were also described and comparatively analysed. Histogram analysis related to different earthquake parameters were performed and compared together with the time completeness checks. As addition fault-plane solutions extracted from international or local seismic agencies concerning the studied region were analysed and systemised (Harvard CMT, INGV, EMEC, EPICA, BSHAP, Drogreshka, 2018). In this study, gaps and inconsistencies were drawn out from these data and alternative state-of-the-art methodologies were proposed to be used for seismogenic fault parametrization as a critical step towards reliable seismic hazard assessment.","PeriodicalId":427395,"journal":{"name":"2nd Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering ‒ 2CroCEE","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2nd Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering ‒ 2CroCEE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5592/co/2crocee.2023.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

N. Macedonia is a country characterized by relatively high seismic activity. As a consequence of its special tectonic regime, and quite frequent occurrence of damaging earthquakes, necessity for reliable seismic hazard and risk assessments are of outmost importance. Initial and one of the most important steps in PSHA is the seismic source characterization. Previously used seismic hazard models at the national level (Mihailov, 1978; Milutinovic et al., 1998; Dojcinovski, 2005; Stamatovska and Koytcheva, 2013; Salic, 2015; Milutinovic et al., 2016) consisted in areal type and/or gridded seismicity sources (Salic, 2015; Milutinovic et al., 2016), owing to the lack of seismogenic active fault parameters. All up to date available national (Basic Geological Map 1:100.000; Arsovski and Petkovski, 1975; Janchevski, 1987; Petkovski, 1992; Arsovski, 1997; Dumurdzanov et al., 2005; Drogreshka, 2018) and regional and European (EDSF13 and EFSM20) fault parametrization data were summarized and comparatively analysed. Three main declustered catalogues of earthquakes (National Seismological Observatory, BSHAP project, and ESHM20-Unified Earthquake Catalogue) for the territory of N. Macedonia and border region were also described and comparatively analysed. Histogram analysis related to different earthquake parameters were performed and compared together with the time completeness checks. As addition fault-plane solutions extracted from international or local seismic agencies concerning the studied region were analysed and systemised (Harvard CMT, INGV, EMEC, EPICA, BSHAP, Drogreshka, 2018). In this study, gaps and inconsistencies were drawn out from these data and alternative state-of-the-art methodologies were proposed to be used for seismogenic fault parametrization as a critical step towards reliable seismic hazard assessment.
北马其顿现有地震构造资料汇编,作为psha的输入
北马其顿是一个地震活动相对频繁的国家。由于其特殊的构造状况,以及破坏性地震的频繁发生,可靠的地震灾害和风险评估的必要性至关重要。PSHA的初始和最重要的步骤之一是震源表征。以前在国家一级使用的地震危险性模型(Mihailov, 1978;Milutinovic et al., 1998;Dojcinovski, 2005;斯塔马托夫斯卡和科伊切娃,2013;撒利族的,2015;Milutinovic等人,2016)由面型和/或网格地震活动性震源组成(Salic, 2015;Milutinovic et al., 2016),由于缺乏孕震活动断层参数。所有最新可用的国家(1:10 .000)基本地质图;Arsovski and Petkovski, 1975;Janchevski, 1987;Petkovski, 1992;Arsovski, 1997;Dumurdzanov et al., 2005;Drogreshka, 2018)和区域和欧洲(EDSF13和EFSM20)故障参数化数据进行了汇总和比较分析。对北马其顿境内和边境地区的三个主要分类地震目录(国家地震观测站、BSHAP项目和eshm20统一地震目录)进行了描述和比较分析。对不同地震参数进行了直方图分析,并进行了时间完备性检验。此外,从国际或当地地震机构提取的有关研究区域的断平面解进行了分析和系统化(Harvard CMT, INGV, EMEC, EPICA, BSHAP, Drogreshka, 2018)。在这项研究中,从这些数据中找出了差距和不一致之处,并提出了用于发震断层参数化的替代最先进的方法,作为可靠的地震危险性评估的关键步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信