Minimization of Makespan Using FCFS Method and Genetic Algorithm Method Comparison in Aluminum Industry

I. Siregar, I. Rizkya, R. M. Sari, K. Syahputri
{"title":"Minimization of Makespan Using FCFS Method and Genetic Algorithm Method Comparison in Aluminum Industry","authors":"I. Siregar, I. Rizkya, R. M. Sari, K. Syahputri","doi":"10.1109/elticom47379.2019.8943914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies that produce Aluminum are experiencing rapid development. The company uses a flow shop system and the demand type is make to order. In the scheduling system the company currently uses First Come First Served (FCFS). The company still finds an improper quantity schedules, which results in a large amount of makespan and causes inaccurate product delivery schedules for consumers. The study was conducted to find the optimal sequence of scheduling with makespan minimization criteria by the genetic algorithm method and FCFS method comparison. The FCFS method used by the company produces makespan of 55,970 hours when the Genetic Algorithm method produces makespan of 46,637 hours. The recommendation method has a better performance level compared to the company shown in efficiency index (EI). The EI value of the Genetic Algorithm method is 1,20 (EI> 1) which shows that the Genetic Algorithm has good performance compared to the FCFS method. The calculation of the value of Relative Error (RE) shows that the saving of makespan obtained by the Genetic Algorithm method with the FCFS method is 20,13%. The conclusion is that the Genetic Algorithm method produces the minimum makespan value with a reduction of makespan of 9,33 hours. The schedule obtained using the Genetic Algorithm method is Job 2 - Job 3 - Job 1-Job 5 and Job 4. Job on the floor based on products section that produces in this industry. Jobs mean profile of aluminum that produced.","PeriodicalId":131994,"journal":{"name":"2019 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Telecommunication and Computer Engineering (ELTICOM)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Telecommunication and Computer Engineering (ELTICOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/elticom47379.2019.8943914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Companies that produce Aluminum are experiencing rapid development. The company uses a flow shop system and the demand type is make to order. In the scheduling system the company currently uses First Come First Served (FCFS). The company still finds an improper quantity schedules, which results in a large amount of makespan and causes inaccurate product delivery schedules for consumers. The study was conducted to find the optimal sequence of scheduling with makespan minimization criteria by the genetic algorithm method and FCFS method comparison. The FCFS method used by the company produces makespan of 55,970 hours when the Genetic Algorithm method produces makespan of 46,637 hours. The recommendation method has a better performance level compared to the company shown in efficiency index (EI). The EI value of the Genetic Algorithm method is 1,20 (EI> 1) which shows that the Genetic Algorithm has good performance compared to the FCFS method. The calculation of the value of Relative Error (RE) shows that the saving of makespan obtained by the Genetic Algorithm method with the FCFS method is 20,13%. The conclusion is that the Genetic Algorithm method produces the minimum makespan value with a reduction of makespan of 9,33 hours. The schedule obtained using the Genetic Algorithm method is Job 2 - Job 3 - Job 1-Job 5 and Job 4. Job on the floor based on products section that produces in this industry. Jobs mean profile of aluminum that produced.
铝工业最大完工时间最小化的FCFS方法与遗传算法比较
生产铝的公司正在快速发展。公司采用流水作业系统,需求类型为订制。在调度系统中,公司目前使用先到先得(FCFS)。公司仍然发现不合理的数量计划,导致大量的makespan,给消费者造成不准确的产品交付时间。通过遗传算法和FCFS方法的比较,研究了以最大完工时间最小为准则的最优调度顺序。该公司使用的FCFS方法生成的makespan为55970小时,而遗传算法生成的makespan为46637小时。与效率指数(EI)显示的公司相比,推荐方法具有更好的绩效水平。遗传算法方法的EI值为1,20 (EI> 1),表明遗传算法与FCFS方法相比具有较好的性能。相对误差(RE)值的计算表明,遗传算法方法与FCFS方法的最大跨度节省20.13%。研究结果表明,遗传算法方法产生的makespan值最小,使makespan减少了9.33小时。遗传算法得到的调度顺序为Job 2 -Job 3 -Job 1-Job 5和Job 4。根据该行业生产的产品部门在地板上工作。工作岗位意味着铝型材的生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信