Evaluation of important factors in accepts or reject of upper limb prosthesis in children

Meria Yazdani, M. Kamali
{"title":"Evaluation of important factors in accepts or reject of upper limb prosthesis in children","authors":"Meria Yazdani, M. Kamali","doi":"10.18844/GJPAAS.V0I7.3163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: upper limb amputee Children usually uses prosthesis for better function. But studies show a high percentage of rejection of the prosthesis in this group. In clinical studies, there are not very different in function of children who use of prosthesis and those who do not. Answer to why children accept and use their prosthesis or reject it could help and improve the future design of the prosthesis and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was finding important criteria for children with below elbow amputation, their parents and therapists for acceptance and use of prosthetics or rejects it in children group. Method: This study was conducted by literature search of Science direct, Google Scholar, Cochran Library, MEDLINE and PubMed between 1966 and 2014 ,that investigated effective factors in accept or reject of below elbow prosthesis in below elbow amputee children.For quality assessment of articles we rated each paper using the Downs and Black score ranges and Pedro scale . The two reviewers independently read and classified the articles by population, type of study and results. Results After initial evaluation and reviews, 14 articles were included in this study. Most studies were reported form and questionnaire and clinical observations.The general characteristics of the prosthesis, prosthesis control method, quality of life, family and the rehabilitation procedures were important factors were explored in these literature.  Conclusion According to the studies, it is necessary to optimize the prosthesis according to the real children expectations and needs to improve their quality of life.There are controversial studies about performance and first time prosthesis in children but studies confirmed that Group therapy can increase the acceptance rate of prosthesis. Training and finding  ways for function without prosthesis along using it to communicate with the environment, increase motor control and sensory perception that could increase accept of prosthesis in children. Keywords: upper limb prosthesis, children, amputation","PeriodicalId":268365,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal on Advances Pure and Applied Sciences","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal on Advances Pure and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/GJPAAS.V0I7.3163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: upper limb amputee Children usually uses prosthesis for better function. But studies show a high percentage of rejection of the prosthesis in this group. In clinical studies, there are not very different in function of children who use of prosthesis and those who do not. Answer to why children accept and use their prosthesis or reject it could help and improve the future design of the prosthesis and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was finding important criteria for children with below elbow amputation, their parents and therapists for acceptance and use of prosthetics or rejects it in children group. Method: This study was conducted by literature search of Science direct, Google Scholar, Cochran Library, MEDLINE and PubMed between 1966 and 2014 ,that investigated effective factors in accept or reject of below elbow prosthesis in below elbow amputee children.For quality assessment of articles we rated each paper using the Downs and Black score ranges and Pedro scale . The two reviewers independently read and classified the articles by population, type of study and results. Results After initial evaluation and reviews, 14 articles were included in this study. Most studies were reported form and questionnaire and clinical observations.The general characteristics of the prosthesis, prosthesis control method, quality of life, family and the rehabilitation procedures were important factors were explored in these literature.  Conclusion According to the studies, it is necessary to optimize the prosthesis according to the real children expectations and needs to improve their quality of life.There are controversial studies about performance and first time prosthesis in children but studies confirmed that Group therapy can increase the acceptance rate of prosthesis. Training and finding  ways for function without prosthesis along using it to communicate with the environment, increase motor control and sensory perception that could increase accept of prosthesis in children. Keywords: upper limb prosthesis, children, amputation
儿童上肢假体接受或拒绝的重要因素评价
儿童通常使用义肢以获得更好的功能。但研究表明,这组患者对假体的排异率很高。在临床研究中,使用假体和不使用假体的儿童在功能上没有太大的差异。回答孩子们为什么接受和使用他们的假肢或拒绝它可以帮助和改进未来的假肢设计和康复。本研究的目的是为肘部以下截肢的儿童、他们的父母和治疗师找到接受和使用假肢或拒绝使用假肢的重要标准。方法:通过Science direct、谷歌Scholar、Cochran Library、MEDLINE、PubMed等网站1966 - 2014年的文献检索,探讨影响下肘截肢儿童接受或拒绝下肘假体的影响因素。对于文章的质量评估,我们使用唐斯和布莱克评分范围和佩德罗量表对每篇论文进行评分。两位审稿人独立阅读并根据人群、研究类型和结果对文章进行分类。结果经初步评价和回顾,本研究共纳入14篇文献。大多数研究报告采用问卷调查和临床观察的形式。这些文献探讨了假体的一般特征、假体的控制方法、生活质量、家庭和康复程序是重要因素。结论根据研究结果,有必要根据儿童的真实期望和需求对假体进行优化,以提高儿童的生活质量。关于儿童义肢的表现和首次义肢的研究存在争议,但研究证实团体治疗可以提高义肢的接受率。训练和寻找没有假肢的功能以及使用它与环境沟通的方法,增加运动控制和感觉知觉,可以增加儿童对假肢的接受度。关键词:上肢假肢,儿童,截肢
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信