Where is open data in the Open Data Directive?

Inf. Polity Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.3233/ip-220053
H. Broomfield
{"title":"Where is open data in the Open Data Directive?","authors":"H. Broomfield","doi":"10.3233/ip-220053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The re-use of non-sensitive public sector information is deemed crucial for the realisation of the European data economy. The latest regulatory iteration in this field comes in the form of the Directive on Open Data and the Re-use of Public Sector Information, which is known as the Open Data Directive (ODD). It is a recast of Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information – or the Public Sector Information (PSI) Directive – which is entrenched in the internal market and focused on sharing data for economic gain. However, the new directive further embraces the concept of ‘open data’, a concept rooted in openness and transparency for citizen participation. It is important to interrogate and elicit which aspects of open data the directive incorporates, and which ones fall outside of its purview. Hence, the present paper undertakes a critical analysis of the ODD. It asks firstly, how does the directive align with and diverge from the rationale and requirements of the movement for open data? And secondly, what are the implications of this for citizen participation? The findings show that the original largely technical principles of open data are somewhat respected and incorporated into the ODD but are disjointed from the rationale behind them. References to citizen participation in the directive and supporting documentation, while welcome, risk being little more than window dressing.","PeriodicalId":418875,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Polity","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Polity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-220053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The re-use of non-sensitive public sector information is deemed crucial for the realisation of the European data economy. The latest regulatory iteration in this field comes in the form of the Directive on Open Data and the Re-use of Public Sector Information, which is known as the Open Data Directive (ODD). It is a recast of Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information – or the Public Sector Information (PSI) Directive – which is entrenched in the internal market and focused on sharing data for economic gain. However, the new directive further embraces the concept of ‘open data’, a concept rooted in openness and transparency for citizen participation. It is important to interrogate and elicit which aspects of open data the directive incorporates, and which ones fall outside of its purview. Hence, the present paper undertakes a critical analysis of the ODD. It asks firstly, how does the directive align with and diverge from the rationale and requirements of the movement for open data? And secondly, what are the implications of this for citizen participation? The findings show that the original largely technical principles of open data are somewhat respected and incorporated into the ODD but are disjointed from the rationale behind them. References to citizen participation in the directive and supporting documentation, while welcome, risk being little more than window dressing.
开放数据指令中的开放数据在哪里?
对非敏感公共部门信息的再利用被认为是实现欧洲数据经济的关键。该领域最新的监管迭代以开放数据和公共部门信息再利用指令的形式出现,即开放数据指令(ODD)。它是关于公共部门信息再利用的2003/98/EC指令(或公共部门信息(PSI)指令)的重制版,该指令在内部市场中根深蒂固,专注于共享数据以获取经济利益。然而,新指令进一步包含了“开放数据”的概念,这一概念植根于公民参与的开放和透明。询问和引出该指令包含开放数据的哪些方面,以及哪些方面不在其范围之内,这一点很重要。因此,本文对ODD进行了批判性分析。它首先问道,该指令如何与开放数据运动的基本原理和要求保持一致并偏离?其次,这对公民参与有什么影响?研究结果表明,开放数据最初的主要技术原则在一定程度上得到了尊重,并被纳入了ODD,但与它们背后的基本原理脱节了。在指令和支持文件中提及公民参与,虽然受到欢迎,但可能只不过是装点门面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信